Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

KANTABEN BALDEVBHAI RANA SINCE DECEASED THRU L/H JAYESHBHAI BALDEVBAHI RANAversusMUSTANG RICE MILL PRIVATE LIMITED

Disposal
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The civil application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, represented by Mr. P C Chaudhary, failed to comply with the High Court's order dated 02.08.2024 requiring them to provide a fresh address for an unserved respondent by 31.07.2026. Despite a further order on 20.07.2026 giving them a final opportunity, the petitioners did not furnish the required information. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in prosecuting the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the civil application for non‑prosecution and discharged the rule. The office note was also disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the civil application should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioners' failure to comply with the court's directions?

Subjects

civil procedurenon-prosecutiondismissalcourt directionscompliance

Judgment

         C/CA/4153/2019                                                               ORDER DATED: 06/08/2026




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                   R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4153 of 2019
                In R/CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION/339/2013
=============================================
      KANTABEN BALDEVBHAI RANA SINCE DECEASED THRU L/H
                JAYESHBHAI BALDEVBAHI RANA & ANR.
                                 Versus
            MUSTANG RICE MILL PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
=============================================
Appearance:
MR P C CHAUDHARI(5770) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
MR P P MAJMUDAR(5284) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR UT MISHRA(3605) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No.
10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,4,5,6,7,8,9
RULE UNSERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=============================================
  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT
                                             Date : 06/08/2026
                                              ORAL ORDER
1.         Perused the o8ice note dated 01.08.2026.

2.         This Court vide its order dated 20.07.2026, passed the
following order :
             “1. After perusing the o ce note placed by the
             Registry, it appears that the applicant has not
             complied with the order dated 02.08.2024.
             2.  The applicants to supply fresh address of the
             unserved respondent on or before 31.07.2026, failing
             which, the matter shall stand dismissed for non-
             prosecution.”

3.         It appears that in spite of giving su8icient opportunity,
the directions contained in the aforesaid order passed by this
Court are not complied with by the applicants. It seems that
the applicants are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, the Civil Application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Rule is discharged. O8ice note is disposed of.

                                                                               (MAULIK J. SHELAT, J)
GAURAV J THAKER
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: GAURAVKUMAR JANARDANBHAI THAKER(HC00951), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 07/08/2026 18:59:13



                                                         Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "civil procedure"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.