THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusMAHENDRASINH BABBHA CHUDASAMA
- Disposal
- 53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
- Bench
- HASMUKH D SUTHAR
Holding
The delay of 39 days is condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Summary
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application seeking condonation of a 39‑day delay in filing, citing administrative approvals as the cause. The first appeal had been dismissed for default due to non‑removal of office objections, prompting a motion for restoration. The application was made under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court, after hearing counsel, found that sufficient cause was shown and relied on the Supreme Court decision in N. Balakrishnan v. N. Krishnamurthy. Consequently, the court allowed the condonation of delay.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 39 days in filing a Miscellaneous Civil Application can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
Legislation cited
- Limitation Acts. 5
Subjects
Judgment
C/CA/6128/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 6128
of 2025
In F/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION/31732/2025
In F/FIRST APPEAL/17901/2025
==============================================
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
Versus
MAHENDRASINH BABBHA CHUDASAMA & ORS.
==============================================
Appearance:
MR NAGESH C SOOD(1928) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
==============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 06/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate for the applicant.
2. This application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for
condonation of delay of 39 days caused in filing the captioned Misc. Civil
Application on the ground of administrative approval and other
administrative reasons. The captioned First Appeal was dismissed for
default for non removal of office objections and hence the MCA for
restoration was filed with the present application for condonation of delay.
3. Having heard the learned advocates for the respective parties and
considering the averments made in this application, it appears that
sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay and in view of the
judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of N.
Balakrishnan vs. N. Krishnamurthy, reported in AIR 1998 SUPREME
COURT 3222, therefore, the delay of 39 days as explained by the
learned advocate for the applicant is considered. The application is
accordingly allowed.
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
ANKIT JANSARI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANKIT YOGESHBHAI JANSARI(HCW0109), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/01/2026 16:12:34
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.