High Court of Gujarat
KAMLESHKUMARI PANCHAMSINGH THAKUR(THAKORE)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Decided
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
The Court held that the delay was sufficiently explained and therefore condoned.
Summary
The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking condonation of a nine‑day delay in filing a restoration application. The respondent opposed the condonation. The petitioner’s counsel explained the reasons for the delay in the memorandum of application. After considering the submissions of both sides, the Court found that the explanation for the delay was satisfactory. Consequently, the Court allowed the application and condoned the delay, permitting the restoration application to proceed.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of nine days in filing a restoration application can be condoned
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- restoration application
- criminal procedure
- high court
- Gujarat
Judgment
R/CR.MA/14024/2026 ORDER DATED: 29/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
14024 of 2026
In R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/17666/2026
In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL/1756/2022
==========================================================
KAMLESHKUMARI PANCHAMSINGH THAKUR(THAKORE)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KV SHELAT(834) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR NIRAJ SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
REFUSED SERVED (N)(10) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 29/07/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. By this application the applicant seeks condonation of delay
of 9 days caused in filing the Restoration Application.
2. Learned advocate for the applicant has stated reasons at
para no.3 of the application for the delay in filing the
restoration application.
3. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned
advocates for the respective parties and more particularly
considering the averments made in the memorandum of
application, the Court is of the view that the delay caused
in filing the Restoration Application has been sufficiently
explained.
Page 1 of 2
R/CR.MA/14024/2026 ORDER DATED: 29/07/2026
4. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly,
allowed. The delay is hereby condoned.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
URIL RANA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 29/07/2026 16:39:56
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.