Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SHIVANAND VISHNUPRASAD RAMPYARE PANDE THRO RUBI SHIVANAND PANDEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application for temporary bail is rejected.

Summary

The applicant, Shivanand Vishnupasad Rampyare Pand... (Rubi Shivananand Pand...), filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of making financial arrangements. The applicant failed to appear when called out. The Additional Public Prosecutor highlighted that the applicant had previously absconded for 330 days after being released on temporary bail on 26-08-2022. Considering these jail remarks, the Court examined whether it should exercise its discretion to grant bail. The Court concluded that the applicant’s conduct demonstrated a risk of non‑appearance and therefore declined to grant bail. Consequently, the application for temporary bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court should grant temporary bail to the applicant in view of his prior absconding.

Subjects

  • temporary bail
  • bail discretion
  • absconding
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/1451/2026                          ORDER DATED: 10/03/2026




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL)
                  NO. 1451 of 2026

================================================
  SHIVANAND VISHNUPRASAD RAMPYARE PANDE THRO
               RUBI SHIVANAND PANDE
                          Versus
              STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
================================================
Appearance:
PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                          Date : 10/03/2026

                           ORAL ORDER


1.     This application is filed by the applicant seeking temporary
bail for 30 days on the ground of making financial arrangements.


2.     When called out, party-in-person is not present.


3.     Heard, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
respondent – State and perused the jail remarks.


3.     Considering the jail remarks, it appears that the applicant
absconded for 330 days when he was earlier released on


                               Page 1 of 2
           R/CR.MA/1451/2026                                                             ORDER DATED: 10/03/2026




    temporary bail by an order dated 26.08.2022.


    4.         In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to exercise
    discretion in favour of the present applicant. The application fails
    and is rejected, accordingly.


                                                                                               [ P. M. Raval, J. ]
    hiren/52tss10326




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/03/2026 17:48:42




                                                           Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.