KAUSHIK @ KAVO JIGNESHBHAI @ JAGDISHBHAI BARAIYA (TALPADA KOLI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

    R/CR.MA/16071/2026                               ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
               CHARGESHEET) NO. 16071 of 2026

==========================================================
 KAUSHIK @ KAVO JIGNESHBHAI @ JAGDISHBHAI BARAIYA (TALPADA
                           KOLI)
                           Versus
                     STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SANJAY PRAJAPATI(3227) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                             Date : 16/07/2026

                                  ORDER

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11195036260066 of 2026 registered
with Pathavada Police Station, Banaskantha, for the offence under the
provisions of The Gujarat Prohibition Act.

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that
applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence.
Substantial part of investigation is over. The applicant has no past
antecedent. He is owner of the car in which contraband liquor was
transporting. He therefore submits that, considering the nature of the
offence, the applicants may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable
conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant was
owner of the car from which contraband liquor was found and therefore, he
is very much involved in the offence. Considering the conduct of the



                                  Page 1 of 4
      R/CR.MA/16071/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




applicant, application does not deserve any consideration.

[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the
accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be
exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.

[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:
(1)       Investigation is almost over;
(2)       Applicant is behind the bar since 12.06.2026;
(3)       There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant;
(4)       There is no possibility to conclude the trial in near future.
(5)       Offence is triable by JMFC Court.
(6)       No past antecedent. He is owner of the car from which contraband
         liquor worth of Rs.1,13,000/- was found.

[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of
trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but


                                      Page 2 of 4
    R/CR.MA/16071/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as
well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.

[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a
fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.
11195036260066 of 2026 registered with Pathavada Police Station,
Banaskantha on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-
five Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of
the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he/she shall;

   (a)     not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
   (b)     not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
           shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not
           to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected
           by the police;
   (c)     surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
   (d)     not leave State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial
           Court concerned;
   (e)     mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a week
           till filing of the chargesheet and after filing of the chargesheet,
           mark presence before the concerned police station once in a
           month for a period of six months;
   (f)     furnish the Aadhaar card, email ID/present address of his
           residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the
           time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence/
           contact number without prior permission of Trial Court;



                                    Page 3 of 4
         R/CR.MA/16071/2026                                                       ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




        (g)       not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned trial
                  Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the applicant.

   [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
   connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the
   above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to
   issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

   [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to
   try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify
   and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

   [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations
   of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court
   while enlarging the applicant on bail.

   [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
   permitted.




                                                                            (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
   SUCHIT

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PATEL SUCHIT JAYESHBHAI(HC01083), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/07/2026 14:34:34




                                                     Page 4 of 4