GIRDHARIRAM S/O MANARAM SONARAM JAAT (GODARA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

    R/CR.MA/17280/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026




 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
                CHARGESHEET) NO. 17280 of 2026
==========================================================
      GIRDHARIRAM S/O MANARAM SONARAM JAAT (GODARA)
                                Versus
                         STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR N R DESAI(6504) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR HIMANSHU PATEL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                              Date : 27/07/2026
                                  ORDER
[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No.11996006260756 of 2026 registered with
Tharad Police Station, District Vav-Tharad for the offences under
Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116-B, 99, 98(2), 83 and 81 of the Prohibition Act.

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that
applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the offence and now
nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. He therefore submits
that, considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged
on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the present
application for regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the
accused in the alleged offence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be



                                   Page 1 of 4
      R/CR.MA/17280/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026




exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.

[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:

(1)       The allegation is that the applicant is the supplier of the prohibited
          liquor which has already been seized and even otherwise,
          substantial part of investigation is over;

(2)       None of the offence alleged is punishable with life sentence or
          death penalty and is triable by the Court of Magistrate;

(3)       Applicant is behind the bars since 07.07.2026;

(4)       There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant;

(5)       Though the applicant is having three past antecedents, he is
          presumed to be innocent till proven guilty;

(6)       Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will take some
          time;

(7)       Co-accused similarly situated enlarged on regular bail and



                                     Page 2 of 4
    R/CR.MA/17280/2026                                    ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026




           therefore, on the ground of parity also (Rameshbhai Batubhai
           Dhabi Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2011 (3) GLR 1999), present
           application deserves consideration.

[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of
trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but
amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as
well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.

[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit
case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released      on   regular   bail   in   connection     with   FIR    being         C.R.
No.11996006260756 of 2026 registered with Tharad Police Station,
District Vav-Tharad on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees
Twenty-five Thousand only) with ONE LOCAL SURETY of the like amount to
the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

     (a)      not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

     (b)      not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
              shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall
              not to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be
              collected by the police;

     (c)      surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

     (d)      not leave the country without prior permission of the Trial


                                     Page 3 of 4
     R/CR.MA/17280/2026                                                           ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026




               Court concerned;

      (e)      mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a
               week till filing of the chargesheet and after filing of the
               chargesheet, mark presence before the concerned police
               station once in a month for a period of six months;

      (f)      furnish the copy of Aadhaar card, email ID/contact number /
               permanent and present address of his residence to the
               Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of
               execution of the bond and shall not change the residence and
               contact number/SIM card without prior permission of Trial
               Court;

      (g)      not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned trial
               Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the applicant.


[9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the
above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to
issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

[10.0]             Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete,
modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

[11.0]             At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the
observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by
this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

[12.0]             Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted.



                                                                       (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)
Ajay
  Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
  Digitally signed by: AJAY CHANDRAN MENON(HC00939), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/07/2026 14:47:34




                                                   Page 4 of 4