Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

KIRANKUMAR RAMANBHAI BHUVALIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The Court held that regular bail should be granted to the applicant subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

The applicant, Kirankumar Ramanbhai Bhuvaliya, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. He claimed innocence, lack of prior record, and that the investigation was substantially complete. The State opposed, alleging involvement in the offence. The Court examined bail principles, including nature of the accusation, risk of witness tampering, likelihood of absconding, and the applicant's character, and referenced Supreme Court precedents on bail jurisprudence. Finding that the applicant posed no flight risk, the offence was triable by a magistrate, and continued detention would amount to pre‑trial punishment, the Court granted regular bail on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with several conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted under Section 483 of the BNSS for an offence under the Gujarat Prohibition Act
  • Whether the applicant's lack of antecedents and the status of investigation justify bail
  • Whether the risk of tampering with evidence or absconding exists

Legislation cited

Subjects

regular bailSection 483 BNSSGujarat Prohibition Actpersonal libertyArticle 21pre‑trial detentionbail conditions

Judgment

    R/CR.MA/18940/2026                               ORDER DATED: 14/08/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
               CHARGESHEET) NO. 18940 of 2026
==========================================================
                    KIRANKUMAR RAMANBHAI BHUVALIYA
                                 Versus
                           STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KANVA ANTANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                             Date : 14/08/2026

                                   ORDER

[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.
[2.0] The present application is     led under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11821014260106 of 2026 registered
with Dhanpur Police Station, Dahod, for the o.ence under the provisions
of The Gujarat Prohibition Act.

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that
applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the o.ence.
Substantial part of investigation is over. He has no past antecedent.
Allegation against the applicant is that he was proposed receiver. He
therefore submits that, considering the nature of the o.ence, the applicant
may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant is
involved in the o.ence. Considering the conduct of the applicant,
application does not deserve any consideration.

[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the
accused in the alleged o.ence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be


                                   Page 1 of 4
      R/CR.MA/18940/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 14/08/2026




exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.

[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:

(1)      The applicant is proposed receiver.
(2)      No past antecedent ;
(3)      Applicant is behind the bar since 07.07.2026;
(4)      Substantial part of investigation is over;
(5)      There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicant;
(6)      There is no possibility to conclude the trial in near future.
(7)      O.ence is triable by the Court of Magistrate.

[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of
trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but
amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as


                                      Page 2 of 4
    R/CR.MA/18940/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 14/08/2026




well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.

[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a
 t case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.
11821014260106 of 2026 registered with Dhanpur Police Station, Dahod
on executing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty- ve Thousand
only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court
and subject to the conditions that he/she shall;

   (a)     not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
   (b)     not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
           shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not
           to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected
           by the police;
   (c)     surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
   (d)     not leave the territory of State of Gujarat without prior
           permission of the Trial Court concerned;
   (e)     mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a week
           till   ling of the chargesheet and after   ling of the chargesheet,
           mark presence before the concerned police station once in a
           month for a period of six months;
   (f)     furnish the copy of Aadhaar card, email ID/contact number /
           permanent and present address of his residence to the
           Investigating ODcer and also to the Court at the time of
           execution of the bond and shall not change the residence and
           contact number/SIM card without prior permission of Trial Court;



                                    Page 3 of 4
             R/CR.MA/18940/2026                                                       ORDER DATED: 14/08/2026




            (g)       not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned trial
                      Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the applicant.

       [9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
       connection with any other o.ence for the time being. If breach of any of the
       above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to
       issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.


       [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to
       try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify
       and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

       [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be inGuenced by the observations
       of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court
       while enlarging the applicant on bail.

       [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
       permitted.



                                                                                (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
       SUCHIT




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PATEL SUCHIT JAYESHBHAI(HC01083), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 14/08/2026 16:00:40


                                                          Page 4 of 4


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.