Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

BALABHAI GELABHAI RAVRIYA(PATEL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The Court allowed the regular bail application, granting bail with conditions.

Summary

The applicant, Balabhai Gelabhai Ravriya, was arrested on 18 July 2026 for allegedly transporting contraband liquor from Maharashtra to Kachchh, an offence under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming innocence and noting that substantial investigation was complete and no further recovery was expected. The State opposed bail, citing the applicant's red‑handed capture and a prior antecedent. The Court examined the standard bail factors, relevant Supreme Court precedents, and the principle that bail is the rule and jail the exception under Article 21. Finding that the case was prima facie suitable for bail and that continued detention would amount to pre‑trial punishment, the Court granted regular bail with a personal bond and several conditions.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate exercise of discretion in granting regular bail before the filing of a chargesheet under Section 483 of the BNSS?
  • Whether the applicant's alleged conduct and prior antecedent preclude the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

regular bailpre‑trial detentioncontraband liquorGujarat Prohibition ActSection 483 BNSSpersonal libertyArticle 21

Judgment

   R/CR.MA/19089/2026                                ORDER DATED: 17/08/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
               CHARGESHEET) NO. 19089 of 2026
==========================================================
                    BALABHAI GELABHAI RAVRIYA(PATEL)
                                 Versus
                           STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ANKIT Y BACHANI(5424) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR KRUTIK PARIKH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                             Date : 17/08/2026

                                   ORDER


[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-State.

[2.0] The present application is     led under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for regular bail in
connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11993004260683 of 2026 registered
with Bhachau Police Station, District : Kachchh East Gandhidham, for the
o.ence under the provisions of The Gujarat Prohibition Act.

[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that
applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the o.ence.
Substantial part of investigation is over. Muddamal is already recovered. He
therefore submits that, considering the nature of the o.ence, the
applicants may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and submitted that, the applicant was
caught red handed while transporting liquor from Maharashtra to Kachchh.
Further, he has one past antecedent. Considering the conduct of the
applicants, application does not deserve any consideration.

[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement of the


                                   Page 1 of 4
      R/CR.MA/19089/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 17/08/2026




accused in the alleged o.ence, the jurisdiction to grant bail has to be
exercised on the basis of the well settled principles having regard to the
facts and circumstances of each case and the following factors are to be
taken into consideration while considering an application for bail: (i) the
nature of accusation and the severity of the punishment and the nature of
the materials relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension
of tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of the
accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence; (iv)
character behaviour and standing of the accused and the circumstances
which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest of the public or the
State and similar other considerations are required to be considered.

[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Following aspects
have been considered:

(1)      The applicant was caught red handed while transporting
         contraband liquor from Maharashtra to Kachchh.
(2)      Though the applicant is having past antecedent, he is presumed to be
         innocent till proven guilty;
(3)      Applicant is behind the bar since 18.07.2026;
(4)      Substantial part of investigation is over;
(5)      There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the applicants;
(6)      There is no possibility to conclude the trial in near future.
(7)      O.ence is triable by the Court of Magistrate.

[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as well as in the case of
Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs. Public Prosecutor, High Court of
Andhra Pradesh reported in (1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of


                                        Page 2 of 4
    R/CR.MA/19089/2026                                  ORDER DATED: 17/08/2026




trial will take time and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but
amounts to pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is exception” as
well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, present application deserves consideration.

[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a
 t case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicants on regular bail.
Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicants are ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.
11993004260683 of 2026 registered with Bhachau Police Station,
District : Kachchh East Gandhidham, on executing a personal bond of
Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty- ve Thousand only) each with one surety of the
like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the
conditions that they shall;

   (a)     not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
   (b)     not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution &
           shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not
           to play mischief with the evidence collected or yet to be collected
           by the police;
   (c)     surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;
   (d)     not leave the territory of State of Gujarat without prior
           permission of the Trial Court concerned;
   (e)     mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a week
           till   ling of the chargesheet and after   ling of the chargesheet,
           mark presence before the concerned police station once in a
           month for a period of six months;
   (f)     furnish the copy of Aadhaar card, email ID/contact number /



                                    Page 3 of 4
         R/CR.MA/19089/2026                                                        ORDER DATED: 17/08/2026




                  permanent and present address of his residence to the
                  Investigating OEcer and also to the Court at the time of
                  execution of the bond and shall not change the residence and
                  contact number/SIM card without prior permission of Trial Court;
        (g)       not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned trial
                  Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the applicant.
        (h)       not to enter into Kachchh District for a period of six months
                  except for marking presence before the concerned police
                  station and/or for attending Court;

   [9.0] The authorities will release the applicants only if they are not required
   in connection with any other o.ence for the time being. If breach of any of
   the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be
   free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

   [10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to
   try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify
   and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

   [11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be inHuenced by the observations
   of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court
   while enlarging the applicants on bail.

   [12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
   permitted.



                                                                            (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)

   SUCHIT




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PATEL SUCHIT JAYESHBHAI(HC01083), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 17/08/2026 14:46:53

                                                      Page 4 of 4


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.