Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

ABHAY RANJITBHAI PARMAR(DIDAVALA)versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The court partially allowed the application, granting temporary bail for 14 days on a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with surety and prohibiting any further extension.

Summary

Abhay Ranjitbhai Parmar applied for temporary bail for a period of 30 days. The State opposed the application, but waived service of notice. The Gujarat High Court considered the grounds and partially allowed the application, granting temporary bail for 14 days upon the applicant furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000 with an equal surety. The applicant must report daily to the police station and surrender to the jail authority after the bail period expires. The Court ordered that no further extension of the temporary bail would be entertained and made the rule absolute.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to temporary bail pending trial

Subjects

temporary bailpersonal bondsuretypolice custodyGujarat High Court

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/1965/2026                              ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 1965 of
                            2026

==========================================================
                    ABHAY RANJITBHAI PARMAR(DIDAVALA)
                                  Versus
                       THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR.ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
       DESAI

                             Date : 10/02/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER

1.     This application is preferred by the Applicant for
temporary bail for a period of 30 days on the ground
mentioned in the application.


2.     Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and
learned APP for the Respondent - State.


3.     RULE. Learned APP waives service of notice Rule
on behalf of the respondent-State.


4.     Considering         the     grounds       mentioned         in         the
Application, this Court is of the opinion that the present
application requires consideration and the same is
therefore partly allowed. The Applicant is ordered to be
released on temporary bail for a period of 14 Days from
the date of actual release on the Applicant’s furnishing a


                                   Page 1 of 2
        R/CR.MA/1965/2026                                                            ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




 personal bond of Rs.25000/- with a surety of the like
 amount to the satisfaction of the concerned authority, on
 usual terms and conditions. The applicant shall mark his
 presence daily before the concerned police station. The
 Applicant shall surrender before the concerned jail
 authority on expiry of the temporary bail period.


 5.        This         Court           shall         not        entertain               application                for
 reduction of amount of personal bond and surety.


 6.        The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. It
 is hereby clari1ed that no further extension shall be
 granted. Rule is made absolute accordingly.                                                                 Direct
 service permitted.




                                                              (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
 ANKIT SHAH

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANKIT PRADIPKUMAR SHAH(HC01063), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/02/2026 18:16:07




                                                       Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "temporary bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.