Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

ANIKET ARJANBHAI SURELAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The Court held that regular bail should be granted as the applicant satisfied the criteria of residence, lack of criminal antecedents, and settlement of the dispute, and there was no prima facie need for continued detention.

Summary

Aniket Arjanbhai Surela applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(3), 61(2) and 238(2). The applicant, a permanent resident of Rajkot with no prior criminal record, argued that further incarceration would not aid the investigation and that the complainant had signed an affidavit stating the dispute was amicably settled. The State opposed bail, contending that the nature of the offences and the applicant’s role warranted denial of liberty. The Court considered the applicant’s residence, lack of antecedents, the complainant’s settlement affidavit, and the fact that two co‑accused had already been granted bail, and applied the principles laid down in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI. Finding a prima facie case and deeming the applicant fit for bail, the Court ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.25,000 and several conditions. The order also allowed the trial court to modify or relax conditions as necessary.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail can be granted after the filing of a charge‑sheet for offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the settlement between the complainant and the accused affects the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

regular bailcharge-sheetBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitasettlement affidavitcriminal procedureGujarat High Court

Judgment

     R/CR.MA/23122/2025                                 ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                 CHARGESHEET) NO. 23122 of 2025

==========================================================
                          ANIKET ARJANBHAI SURELA
                                   Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR SOAHAM JOSHI, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
       DESAI

                              Date : 12/03/2026

                               ORAL ORDER


1.      Heard learned advocate appearing on behalf of the

applicant         and     learned    Additional        Public     Prosecutor

appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.




2.      Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf

of the respondent-State.




3.      The applicant         has filed           this application        under

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,


                                    Page 1 of 7
     R/CR.MA/23122/2025                   ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




2023 for enlarging the applicant on Regular Bail in

connection with FIR being C.R. No. 11208055250236 of

2025 registered with DCB Police Station, Rajkot City for

the offence punishable under Sections        316(2), 316(5),

318(3), 61(2) and 238(2) of the BNS, 2023.




4.      Learned advocate for the applicant would submit

that, considering the role attributed to the applicant, and

nature of the allegation levelled, the applicant may be

enlarged on regular bail. It is further submitted that,

since the charge-sheet is filed, further incarceration of

the applicant will not benefit the Investigation Officer in

any manner. It is further contended that, the applicant is

ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may

be imposed by this Court, if released on bail.           He has

submitted that the complainant has filed an affidavit

stating therein that, he has no objection if the applicant is

released on bail as the dispute has been settled between

the applicant and the complainant.




                           Page 2 of 7
     R/CR.MA/23122/2025                           ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




5.      As against the same, learned Additional Public

Prosecutor appearing for the respondent – State has

vehemently objected to the grant of regular bail. Learned

APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence

and the role attributed to the present applicant as coming

out from the charge-sheet, this Court may not exercise

discretion in favour of the applicant and the application

may be dismissed.




6.      I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf

of the respective parties and perused the papers.

Following aspects are considered:-




     i. The applicant is a permanent resident of Rajkot,

     hence would be available at the time of trial;

     ii. The      applicant    does     not    have   any       criminal

     antecedents;

     iii. The     original    complainant      Yatinbhai      Babubhai

     Chudasama has filed an affidavit-in-reply wherein, he



                                 Page 3 of 7
     R/CR.MA/23122/2025                    ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




     has stated that, the dispute between him and the

     present applicant has been amicably settled.            He is

     present before the court today and has affirmed the

     said averments.

     iv. Two co-accused have been granted regular bail by

     the concerned Sessions Court, and the IO had made

     recovery of more amount from one of them, than the

     present applicant.




7.      This Court has taken into consideration the law laid

down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay

Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported

in [2012] 1 SCC 40.




8.      In the facts and circumstances of the case and

considering the nature of the allegations made against

the applicant in the First Information Report, without

discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court

is of the opinion that, this is a fit case to exercise the

discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

                            Page 4 of 7
     R/CR.MA/23122/2025                                ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




9.      Hence, the present application is allowed. The

applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection

with F.I.R. registered as C.R. No. 11208055250236 of

2025 registered with DCB Police Station, Rajkot City, on

executing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the

satisfaction          of the   trial   Court     and    subject        to    the

conditions that he shall;




     [a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse

     liberty;

     [b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the

     prosecution;

     [c] surrender his passport, if any, to the trial court

     within a week, and if he does not possess a passport,

     he shall file an affidavit to that effect;

     [d] not leave the local limits of Rajkot district without

     prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;




                                   Page 5 of 7
   R/CR.MA/23122/2025                     ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




  [e] furnish the present address of his residence to the

  I.O. and to the Court at the time of execution of the

  bond and shall not change his residence without prior

  intimation to the I.O. and the court;

  [f] mark his presence on every Monday before the

  concerned police station for six months;

  [g] not indulge in similar kind of offence hereinafter,

  for which, he shall file affidavits before the concerned

  court and the police station.




10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he

is not required in connection with any other offence for

the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is

committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be at

liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law.




11. Bail bond to be executed before the trial court

having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the

concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the



                          Page 6 of 7
           R/CR.MA/23122/2025                                                     ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




     above conditions in accordance with law.




     12. At the stage of trial, the competent court shall not be

     influenced by any observations of this Court which are of

     preliminary nature, made at this stage only for the

     purpose of enlarging the applicant on regular bail.




     13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

     Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct

     service is permitted.




                                                             (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
     DIVYA




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: DIVYA NAIR(HC00199), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/03/2026 18:33:00


                                                      Page 7 of 7


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "regular bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.