Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

JAVIDBHAI URFE JAVEDBHAI USMANBHAI PATEL (MUMAN)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application is disposed; the trial court is directed to conclude the trial within six months and liberty is reserved for a fresh application if the trial does not finish within that time.

Summary

Javidbhai Urfe Javedbhai Usmanbhai Patel (Muman) filed a regular bail application after the filing of a chargesheet. He sought a direction that the trial court expedite the trial and, if the trial did not conclude within a reasonable time, to preserve his liberty to approach the High Court again. Advocate Ms. Riyah Z. Sindhi, on behalf of the applicant, chose not to press the application at that stage. The High Court therefore disposed of the application but directed the trial court to complete the trial within six months. The Court also reserved liberty for the applicant to file a fresh application if the trial does not conclude or proceeds only marginally after the six‑month period. No statutory provisions or precedents were cited.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct the trial court to expedite a criminal trial after a chargesheet has been filed
  • Whether liberty can be reserved for the applicant to file a fresh bail application if the trial is not concluded within a reasonable period

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • chargesheet
  • trial expeditious
  • liberty to file fresh application
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

         R/CR.MA/24418/2025                                                        ORDER DATED: 06/02/2026




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER
                     CHARGESHEET) NO. 24418 of 2025

  ========================================================
             JAVIDBHAI URFE JAVEDBHAI USMANBHAI PATEL (MUMAN)
                                    Versus
                              STATE OF GUJARAT
  ========================================================
  Appearance:
  MR. MAHAMMADTOHID M. SINDHI(18283) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
  MS RIYAH Z SINDHI(12457) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
  MS DIVYANGNA JHALA ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
  Respondent(s) No. 1
  ========================================================

      CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL

                                               Date : 06/02/2026

                                                 ORAL ORDER


            Learned Advocate Ms. Riyah Sindhi on behalf of applicant would not
  press the present application at this stage requesting that this Court may
  direct the learned Trial Court to expedite the trial and in case the trial does
  not conclude within a reasonable period of time, liberty may be reserved in
  favour of the present applicant to approach this Court. Having regard to the
  request made, the application stands disposed of. Learned Trial Court is
  directed to expedite the trial and conclude the trial within a period of 6
  months. Liberty is reserved in favour of the applicant to file afresh in case
  the trial does not conclude or atleast proceeds substantially after a period of
  6 months.



                                                                                    (NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J)
  NIRU

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: NIRU ROSHAN SHAH(HC00211), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 07/02/2026 15:04:53




                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.