High Court of Gujarat
KHEMARAM S/O NAVLARAM MEGHVALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Decided
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- NIKHIL S KARIEL
Holding
The Court held that the applicant is entitled to regular bail despite the nature of the offence and prior antecedent, subject to appropriate conditions.
Summary
Khemaram, a driver of a vehicle from which contraband liquor was seized, was charged under several provisions of the Prohibition Act. He sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before the charge-sheet was filed. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offence, the applicant’s prior similar conviction, and a risk of absconding. The Court noted that the applicant was neither the owner nor the ultimate recipient of the liquor and that any flight risk could be mitigated by strict conditions. Relying on the Supreme Court’s principles in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI, the Court found a prima facie case for bail and granted it with a bond and several conditions. The order also directed that the trial court not be influenced by these preliminary observations.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before the charge-sheet is filed.
- Whether the nature of the offences under the Prohibition Act and the applicant’s role as driver preclude the grant of bail.
- Whether the applicant’s prior similar conviction and alleged risk of absconding justify denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 483
- Prohibition Act — s. 116-B, 65(a), 65(e), 81, 98(2), 99
Subjects
- regular bail
- pre‑charge sheet bail
- Prohibition Act
- contraband liquor
- driver liability
- prior conviction
- absconding risk
- bail conditions
Judgment
R/CR.MA/432/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
CHARGESHEET) NO. 432 of 2026
==========================================================
KHEMARAM S/O NAVLARAM MAGHVAL
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS RIYAH Z SINDHI(12457) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR TRUPESH KATHIRIYA ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Date : 09/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate Ms. Riyah Z. Sindhi appearing on behalf of
the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Trupesh
Kathiriya appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the
respondent-State.
3. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging the applicant on
Regular Bail in connection with FIR being C.R. No.11195018251025/2025
registered with Dhanera Police Station, Dist. Banaskantha, for the offence
punishable under Sections 65(a), 65(e), 116-B, 81, 98(2) and 99 of the
Prohibition Act.
4. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that considering the
role attributed to the applicant, and nature of the allegation levelled, the
applicant may be enlarged on regular bail. It is further contended that the
applicant is ready and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be
Page 1 of 4
R/CR.MA/432/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/01/2026
imposed by this Court if released on bail.
5. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing
for the respondent – State has vehemently objected to the grant of regular
bail. Learned APP has submitted that looking to the nature of offence and
the role attributed to the present applicant, this Court may not exercise the
discretion in favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.
6. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective
parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:
(i) While allegation against the applicant being that he was a driver of
the vehicle from which the contraband-liquor had been recovered,
yet, it would appear that the applicant was neither the owner of the
contraband- liquor nor the ultimate recipient of the same.
(ii) The fact of the applicant having one antecedent of similar nature.
(iii) Apprehension of the learned APP that the applicant is not being
resident of the State of Gujarat, if released, he may abscond, could
be allayed by imposing suitable conditions.
This Court has taken into consideration the law laid down by the
Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra v. Central Bureau of
Investigation reported in [2012] 1 SCC 40.
7. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature
of the allegations made against the applicant in the First Information
Report, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is
of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the
applicant on regular bail.
8. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to
be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. registered as C.R.
Page 2 of 4
R/CR.MA/432/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/01/2026
No.11195018251025/2025 registered with Dhanera Police Station, Dist.
Banaskantha, on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand
only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial
Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;
[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the
Sessions Court concerned;
[e] furnish the proposed address of residence to the I.O. and also to
the Court at the time of execution of the bond in the State of
Gujarat and shall not change the residence without prior
intimation to the I.O.;
[f] mark presence once a week till the charge-sheet is filed and
thereafter once a month for a period of six months before the
concerned police station.
9. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in
connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of
the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Court concerned will be
free to take appropriate action in the matter.
10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to
try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify
and/or relax any of the above conditions in accordance with law.
11. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by any
observations of this Court which are of preliminary nature made at this
Page 3 of 4
R/CR.MA/432/2026 ORDER DATED: 09/01/2026
stage, only for the purpose of considering the application of the applicant
for being released on regular bail.
12. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is made
absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is permitted.
(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J)
Y.N. VYAS
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: YAGNESH NARENDRABHAI VYAS(HC00207), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/01/2026 12:18:11
Page 4 of 4
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.