High Court of Gujarat
SADAMHUSEN @ SOYEB SALIMBHAI SHAIKH MEMANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Decided
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- NIKHIL S KARIEL
Holding
The court held that, on a prima facie basis, the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Summary
The applicant, Sadamhusen @ Soyeb Salimkhan Meman, was arrested in connection with FIR C.R. No.11203068260065 for alleged offences under Sections 305(a), 331(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the same Act, contending that he would comply with any conditions imposed. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the nature of the offences and the applicant’s role warranted denial of liberty. The High Court, after considering the facts, the applicant’s custody since 24‑01‑2026, his single antecedent, and the precedent set in Sanjay Chandra v. CBI (2012) 1 SCC 40, held that prima facie the case was suitable for bail. Consequently, the court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs 25,000 with several conditions, including surrender of passport and residence reporting.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail can be granted before the filing of a charge‑sheet for offences punishable under Sections 305(a), 331(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
- Whether the discretion under Section 483 of the B.N.S. Act should be exercised in favour of the applicant despite the nature of the alleged offences.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 305(a), 331(4), 483, 54
Subjects
- regular bail
- pre‑charge‑sheet bail
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- Section 483
- criminal procedure
- Gujarat High Court
- bail conditions
Judgment
R/CR.MA/5103/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/03/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
CHARGESHEET) NO. 5103 of 2026
==========================================================
SADAMHUSEN @ SOYEB SALIMKHAN MEMAN
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MUNJAL V ACHARYA(10678) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR LB DABHI ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Date : 02/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Leave to amend.
2. Heard learned advocate Mr.Munjal Acharya appearing on
behalf of the applicant and learned Additional Public
Prosecutor Mr. L.B.Dabhi appearing on behalf of the
respondent-State.
3. Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the
respondent-State.
4. The applicant has filed this application under Section 483
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for enlarging
Page 1 of 5
R/CR.MA/5103/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/03/2026
the applicant on Regular Bail in connection with FIR being
C.R. No. 11203068260065 of 2026 registered with Vanthali
Police Station, District: Junagadh for the offence punishable
under Sections 305 (a), 331(4) and 54 of the B.N.S. Act.
5. Learned advocate for the applicant would submit that
considering the role attributed to the applicant, and nature of
the allegation levelled, the applicant may be enlarged on
regular bail. It is further contended that the applicant is ready
and willing to abide by all the conditions that may be imposed
by this Court if released on bail.
6. As against the same, learned Additional Public Prosecutor
appearing for the respondent – State has vehemently objected
to the grant of regular bail. Learned APP has submitted that
looking to the nature of offence and the role attributed to the
present applicant, this Court may not exercise the discretion in
favour of the applicant and the application may be dismissed.
7. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of
the respective parties and perused the papers. Following
aspects are considered:-
Page 2 of 5
R/CR.MA/5103/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/03/2026
i. Allegation being that the applicant had committed offence
punishable under Sections 305(a), 331, 54 etc of the BNS Act
and whereas it would appear that the theft is of a basket of
nuts and balls though costing around Rs.2 Lakhs.
ii. The fact of the applicant being in custody since 24.01.2026
and whereas while it is stated that the applicant is having one
antecedent yet considering the maximum punishment that
could be imposed, this Court is inclined to grant bail.
This Court has taken into consideration the law laid
down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay
Chandra v. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012] 1
SCC 40.
8. In the facts and circumstances of the case and
considering the nature of the allegations made against the
applicant in the First Information Report, without discussing
the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion
that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the
applicant on regular bail.
9. Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant
Page 3 of 5
R/CR.MA/5103/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/03/2026
is ordered to be released on bail in connection with F.I.R.
registered as C.R. No. 11203068260065 of 2026 registered with
Vanthali Police Station, District: Junagadh, on executing a
bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with
one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial
Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;
[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
[b] not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
prosecution;
[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a
week;
[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission
of the Sessions Court concerned;
[e] furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and
also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and
shall not change the residence without prior intimation to
the I.O.;
[f] mark presence once a week till the charge-sheet is filed
and thereafter once a month for a period of six three before
the concerned police station.
10. The Authorities will release the applicant only if he is
Page 4 of 5
R/CR.MA/5103/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/03/2026
not required in connection with any other offence for the time
being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed,
the Sessions Court concerned will be free to take appropriate
action in the matter.
11. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned
Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above
conditions in accordance with law.
12. At the stage of trial, the trial court shall not be
influenced by any observations of this Court which are of
preliminary nature made at this stage, only for the purpose of
considering the application of the applicant for being released
on regular bail.
13. The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service is
permitted.
(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J)
NAIR SMITA V./12-DB
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SMITA VINU NAIR(HC00186), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/03/2026 10:51:19
Page 5 of 5
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.