High Court of Gujarat

ARJUNSINH SHATRUDHANSINH CHAUHAN THRO MILAN JIGARBHAI PANJVANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided: 12 March 2026
Disposal: 28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: P M RAVAL

Holding

The court rejected the temporary bail because the applicant had previously absconded for 783 days and exhibited poor conduct in jail.

Summary

The applicant, Arjunsinh Shatrudhansinh Chauhan, applied for a 30‑day temporary bail on the ground of his niece's marriage. The court noted that the applicant had previously been released on temporary bail on 10‑Oct‑2022 and subsequently absconded for 783 days, and that his conduct in jail was also unsatisfactory. Considering these factors, the court rejected the bail application. The order directed the registry to inform the jail authorities. No other relief was granted.

Issues considered

Whether the applicant is entitled to temporary bail despite having previously absconded for 783 days and having poor conduct in jail

Subjects

temporary bail
absconding
jail conduct
marriage of niece
bail application rejection

Judgment

         R/CR.MA/5817/2026                                                            ORDER DATED: 12/03/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


  R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL)
                     NO. 5817 of 2026
 ================================================
   ARJUNSINH SHATRUDHANSINH CHAUHAN THRO MILAN
                  JIGARBHAI PANJVANI
                            Versus
                STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
 ================================================
 Appearance:
 PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 MR CHINTAN DAVE, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 ================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                                               Date : 12/03/2026
                                                ORAL ORDER

 1.          This application is filed by the applicant seeking temporary
 bail for 30 days on the ground of marriage of his niece.


 2.          The jail remarks indicate that earlier when the applicant was
 released on temporary bail by this Court vide order dated 10.10.2022,
 he absconded for 783 days. It further appears that his conduct in jail
 is also not good. Considering the said aspect, this application is
 rejected.


 3.          Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail
 authority.


                                                                                             [ P. M. Raval, J. ]
 hiren/DB/2tss12326


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/03/2026 13:59:05
                                                        Page 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Chintan Dave