Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

PROP. OF KALASHANKAR ART SUMESH M. SHARMA S/O MAHESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The applications are disposed of as they are not pressed.

Summary

The proprietor of Kalashankar Art, Sumesh M. Sharma, filed a series of criminal miscellaneous applications seeking recall of various revision orders. The applicant’s counsel later informed the court that he does not wish to press any of the applications. The court, noting the withdrawal, disposed of all the listed applications without examining their merits. No substantive issues were addressed, and the order simply recorded the disposal. The order was signed by Justice Hasmukh D. Suthar and a copy was to be kept with each application.

Issues considered

  • Whether criminal miscellaneous applications seeking recall should be entertained when the applicant withdraws them

Subjects

criminal procedurerecall applicationwithdrawaldisposal of applications

Judgment

   R/CR.MA/8994/2026                       ORDER DATED: 30/04/2026




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (RECALL) NO. 8994 of 2026

     In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/894/2023
                             With
      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 8996 of 2026
                               In
    R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 932 of 2023
                             With
      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9027 of 2026
                               In
    R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 893 of 2023
                             With
      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9052 of 2026
                               In
    R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 895 of 2023
                             With
      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9053 of 2026
                               In
    R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 896 of 2023
                             With
      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9054 of 2026
                               In
    R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 892 of 2023
                             With
      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9097 of 2026
                               In
    R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 931 of 2023
                             With
      R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 9196 of 2026
                               In
    R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 891 of 2023
============================================
   PROPRIETOR OF KALASHANKAR ART - SUMESH M. SHARMA S/O
                       MAHESH SHARMA
                            Versus
                  STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
============================================
Appearance:
MR NIRAD D BUCH(4000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
============================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                       Date : 30/04/2026


                            Page 1 of 2
      R/CR.MA/8994/2026                                                               ORDER DATED: 30/04/2026




                                             COMMON ORDER
          Learned Advocate for the applicant has submitted that he does
not press the captioned Criminal Misc. Applications.
          Accordingly, the                  captioned           Criminal          Misc.       Applications are
disposed of being not pressed. This Court has not gone into the merit
of the cases.
          A copy of this order be kept in each captioned Criminal Misc.
Applications.




                                                                           (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
ANKIT JANSARI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANKIT YOGESHBHAI JANSARI(HCW0109), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/04/2026 14:47:43




                                                       Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "criminal procedure"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.