Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.versusMINOR JAY @ SUNNY DILIPKUMAR AMBALAL BHOI

Disposal
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

Holding

The appeal is dismissed on the ground of the smallness of the amount, without deciding any substantive issue on merit.

Summary

The United India Insurance Company Limited appealed against a claim of Rs. 4,14,000 arising from a road accident involving the minor claimant, Jay @ Sunny Dilipkumar Ambalal Bhoi and others. The High Court observed that the amount was modest and there was no dispute about the accident itself. Consequently, the Court dismissed the first appeal on the ground of the smallness of the amount, emphasizing that no substantive merits were decided. The judgment expressly stated that it should not be treated as precedent and was intended to avoid further hardship to the claimant. The Tribunal was directed to verify and disburse the full claim amount, deducting any court fees, and any related applications were also disposed of.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate basis for dismissing an appeal when the claim amount is relatively small?
  • Should a dismissal on the ground of smallness of amount be considered a precedent for future cases?
  • Are there procedural obligations for the Tribunal regarding payment and deduction of court fees?

Subjects

insurance claimroad accidentsmall cause of actionappeal dismissalprecedentcourt feestribunal payment

Judgment

     C/FA/1839/2015                               JUDGMENT DATED: 26/02/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1839 of 2015


FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA
==========================================================

            Approved for Reporting                Yes          No

==========================================================
            UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED.
                              Versus
        MINOR JAY @ SUNNY DILIPKUMAR AMBALAL BHOI & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR GC MAZMUDAR(1193) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HG MAZMUDAR(1194) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
ABATED for the Defendant(s) No. 8
MR PALAK H THAKKAR(3455) for the Defendant(s) No. 7
MR UM SHASTRI(830) for the Defendant(s) No. 9
RULE SERVED for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

                              Date : 26/02/2026

                                JUDGMENT


1.     Heard learned advocate Mr. H G Mazmudar appearing

for the Appellant No.1.

2.     What could be noticed is that the insurance company

has challenged an amount to the tune of Rs. 4,14,000/-.

This is a small and meager amount and considering the fact

that as such there is no dispute in regards the happening of

a road accident, I am of the opinion that this appeal may

                                  Page 1 of 3
     C/FA/1839/2015                        JUDGMENT DATED: 26/02/2026




not deserve consideration, more particularly, on the ground

of smallness of amount.      Accordingly, present first appeal

stands dismissed.

3.     It is made clear that present first appeal is dismissed

on account of smallness of the amount and the order

passed by this Court shall not be treated as precedent, more

so when this Court has not decided any issue on merit. The

whole purpose to dismiss the appeal on account of

smallness of amount is with a view to avoid hardship both

physically and financially on the part of the original

claimant to appear and defend the case.            Therefore, this

order shall not be cited as precedent in any pending matters

arising from same accident before any Court.

4.     R & P, if any, to be sent back to the concerned Court

immediately.

5.     The appellant is at liberty to revive the appeal in case

of difficulty.

6.     Consequently connected application/s, if any, also

stands disposed of.



                             Page 2 of 3
         C/FA/1839/2015                                                     JUDGMENT DATED: 26/02/2026




   7.       The learned Tribunal is directed to disburse the entire

   amount to the claimant after due and proper verification.




   8.       While making the payment, the Tribunal shall deduct

   the courts fees, if not paid, in accordance with rules/law.




                                                                                        (J. L. ODEDRA, J)
   RIYA VISHWAKARMA

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RIYA VISHWAKARMA(HC02365), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 05/03/2026 16:06:33




                                                     Page 3 of 3


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "insurance claim"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.