Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NARMADA YOJANA UNIT -3versusPATEL UKABHAI MOHANDAS

Disposal
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH
Bench
C DOSHI

Holding

The appeal is dismissed on account of the smallness of the amount, with no legal issue decided.

Summary

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Narmada Yojana Unit‑3 filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in filing a first appeal against a compensation order. The High Court of Gujarat, after hearing the applicant’s counsel, granted the condonation of delay. However, the Court noted that the compensation amount involved was below Rs 5 lakh, which the State Government had classified as a petty claim to be disposed of without full appellate scrutiny. Consequently, the Court dismissed the first appeal on the ground of the smallness of the amount, expressly stating that no legal issue was decided and the dismissal should not serve as precedent. The Court also directed the return of records to the lower court and ordered the disbursement of the compensation, after deductions and verification, to the claimants with interest.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in preferring the first appeal should be condoned.
  • Whether a first appeal involving a compensation amount below Rs 5 lakh should be entertained.

Subjects

condonation of delayfirst appealpetty claimscompensationsmallness of amountland acquisitionGujarat High Court

Judgment

       C/CA/3456/2026                                    ORDER DATED: 11/08/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 3456 of
                            2026

                           In R/FIRST APPEAL/3711/2026
                                       With
                         R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3711 of 2026
==========================================================
     SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, NARMADA YOJANA UNIT -3
                               Versus
                  PATEL UKABHAI MOHANDAS & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS KINJAL VYAS, AGP for the Applicant(s) No. 1
==========================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. C. DOSHI

                                Date : 11/08/2026
                                     ORDER
Order in Civil Application

        Having heard learned AGP for the applicant and
considering the averments made in the application, present
application is allowed. Delay caused in preferring First Appeal
is condoned.


Order in First Appeal

1.      In the rst appeal, the amount of compensation involved
is below Rs.5 lakh.


2.      The      State     Government      vide     GR    dated       25.10.2016
through its Revenue Department, has resolved that claims
upto Rs.5 lakh are to be considered as petty claims and the
matters involving amount upto Rs.5 lakh be disposed of
accordingly.


                                    Page 1 of 2
         C/CA/3456/2026                                                            ORDER DATED: 11/08/2026




3.        Having heard the submissions made at bar, the amount
involved in the subject matter of present First Appeal is on
lower          side        i.e.      less       than         Rs.5,00,000/-                 and        therefore,
considering the smallness of the awarded amount involved in
the present appeals, the Court is not inclined to entertain the
present            appeals            and         therefore,              present             appeal           stand
dismissed on account of smallness of amount.                                                  Consequently,
CA,       if any,            does         not survive                 and stands                 disposed of
accordingly.


4.        However, it is clari ed that dismissal of present appeal
shall not be construed that the Court has decided any legal
issue involved in the subject matter of present appeals and
therefore, the decision of present appeals shall not be treated
as precedent for deciding any legal issue.



5.        Registry is directed to return back the R & P, if any, to
the concerned Court forthwith.


6.        The learned Reference Court is directed to disburse the
amount of compensation deposited by the appellant after
deducting Court fee to the claimants after due veri cation and
identi cation along with interest and after verifying their
right to claim the compensation.



                                                                                          (J. C. DOSHI,J)
SATISH



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SATISH CHANDRAMOHAN VEMULLA(HC00206), Principal Pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 11/08/2026 16:50:36




                                                      Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "condonation of delay"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.