Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusPRATAPSINH MERUBHA PARMAR

Disposal
39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

Holding

The appeal was dismissed solely because the awarded amount was small, and such dismissal does not set a precedent.

Summary

The dispute stemmed from a road accident for which the claimant was awarded Rs. 3,32,000 as compensation with interest. The insurer, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., filed a first appeal against the award. The respondent contended that the appeal should not be entertained because the quantum of the award was small. The High Court examined whether an appeal could be dismissed solely on the ground of the smallness of the amount without addressing the merits. It dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the dismissal was to avoid physical and financial hardship to the claimant and that the order would not serve as precedent. The court directed that the awarded amount be released to the claimant and permitted the appellant to revive the appeal if necessary.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal may be dismissed solely on the ground of the smallness of the amount awarded without examining the merits

Subjects

appealsmallness of amountcivil procedureprecedentcompensation award

Judgment

    C/FA/534/2015                                JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                      R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 534 of 2015


FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:


HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

==========================================================

          Approved for Reporting                 Yes            No
                                                            ✔
==========================================================
                       NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.
                                   Versus
                    PRATAPSINH MERUBHA PARMAR & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR GC MAZMUDAR(1193) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HG MAZMUDAR(1194) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
DELETED for the Defendant(s) No. 3
MR HARDIK C RAWAL(719) for the Defendant(s) No. 4
MR R.K.MANSURI(3205) for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2
RULE NOT RECD BACK for the Defendant(s) No. 5,6
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J. L. ODEDRA

                             Date : 25/02/2026

                               JUDGMENT

  1. Heard learned advocate for the respective parties.



  2. Learned advocate for the respondent/s pointed out that

      the captioned appeal may not deserve the consideration on

      merits owing to the smallness of the amount awarded to

      the claimant/s. It is noticed that the learned Tribunal has


                                 Page 1 of 3
 C/FA/534/2015                                JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




   awarded amount of Rs. 3,32,000/- as compensation at the

   rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition

   till     realization   of   awarded       amount,       along       with

   proportionate costs, from the opponents. This is a small

   and meager amount and considering the aspect of having

   no dispute in regards to the road accident, I am of the

   opinion that this appeal may not deserve consideration,

   more particularly, on the ground of smallness of amount.

   Accordingly, present first appeal stands dismissed.



3. It is made clear that the present first appeal is dismissed

   on account of smallness of the amount and the order

   passed by this Court shall not be treated as precedent so

   as to say that this Court has decided any issue on merit.

   The whole purpose to dismiss the appeal on account of

   smallness of amount is with a view to avoid hardship both

   physically and financially on the part of the original

   claimant to appear and defend the case.



4. Therefore, this order shall not be cited as precedent in any

   pending matters before any Court in the State of Gujarat.




                               Page 2 of 3
     C/FA/534/2015                                                JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2026




   5. R & P, if any, to be sent back to the concerned Court

         immediately. The entire award amount be disbursed and

         released in favour of claimant/s after due verification by

         transferring said amount/s to the account/s of claimant/s

         by RTGS or NEFT.



   6. The appellant is at liberty to revive the appeal in case of

         difficulty.




                                                                            (J. L. ODEDRA, J)
SUDHIR




                                            Page 3 of 3
    Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
    Digitally signed by: SUDHIR ACHUTHAN EZHUTHASSAN(HC00192), GOV, at High Court of Gujarat on 02/03/2026 18:43:39


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.