High Court of Gujarat
VALAN HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL (DELETED AS PER ORAL ORDER DT 06/01/2026)versusUNION OF INDIA
- Decided
- Disposal
- 26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE
Holding
The rejection of the civil application for interim relief does not amount to a final order and therefore does not merit interference on appeal.
Summary
The appellants, a group of eight students, challenged the cancellation of their admission to the First Year BHMS programme for the academic year 2022-2023 by the principal of Valan Homeopathic Medical College. They filed a civil application seeking interim relief to appear for examinations during the pendency of a writ petition. The Single Judge rejected the civil application, noting procedural deficiencies and that no notice had been issued, and held that the application could not be entertained. On appeal, the High Court examined whether the rejection of the civil application warranted interference and concluded that it did not constitute a final order in the writ proceedings. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal, leaving the petitioners free to continue pursuing relief in the writ court, and made no order as to costs.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate jurisdiction to entertain a civil application for interim relief in a pending writ petition?
- Does the rejection of a civil application for interim relief amount to a final order that can be appealed under the Letters Patent?
- Can the appellants continue to seek relief in the writ court despite the rejection of their interim application?
Subjects
- Letters Patent Appeal
- interim relief
- admission cancellation
- BHMS
- writ petition
- civil application
- higher education
- administrative law
Judgment
C/LPA/1329/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1329 of 2025
In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/7900/2024
==========================================================
VALAN HOMEOPATHIC MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL & ORS.
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NIRAJGIRI M GAUSWAMI(13675) for the Appellant(s) No.
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
MR NISHITH P THAKKAR(2836) for the Appellant(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
MS HETAL PATEL, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
Respondent(s) No. 2
MR AR THACKER(888) for the Respondent(s) No. 4
MR HARSHEEL D SHUKLA(6158) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS.
JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY
Date : 06/01/2026
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)
1. On the prayer made by the learned counsel for the
appellants, the appellant no.1 is deleted from the array of the
parties.
2. Heard Ms. Tanya Agarwal, learned advocate assisted by
Mr. Nishith P. Thakkar, learned advocate for the appellants,
Mr. A.R. Thacker, learned advocate for the respondent no.4,
Mr. Harsheel D. Shukla, learned advocate for the respondent
Page 1 of 3
C/LPA/1329/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/01/2026
no.3 and Ms. Hetal Patel, learned Assistant Government
Pleader for the respondent no.2.
3. This intra-court appeal is directed against the judgment
and order dated 28.11.2025 passed by the learned Single
Judge whereby the Civil Application No.1 of 2025 1led in
Special Civil Application No.7900 of 2024 has been rejected
with the observation in the order that the admission of the
petitioners (08 in numbers) in the First Year BHMS in the
Academic Year 2022-2023 had been cancelled by the Principal
of the College concerned vide letter dated 22.04.2024 w.e.f.
22.04.2024 itself.
4. It is recorded by the writ court while rejecting the
interim relief application that the matter has been listed 29
times by now, but notice has not been issued and, therefore,
no relief is operating in favour of the petitioners as on date.
The Civil Application has been preferred seeking direction the
respondent authority to allow the petitioners to appear in the
examination during the pendency of the writ petition,
therefore, cannot be entertained.
Page 2 of 3
C/LPA/1329/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/01/2026
5. Taking note of the reasoning given by the learned Single
Judge in the order of rejection of Civil Application 1led for
grant of interim relief in the writ petition pending since 2024,
We may say that there is no good ground to interfere,
inasmuch, the rejection of the Civil Application does not
amount to passing of the 1nal order in the pending writ
petition.
6. It is still open for the petitioners to pursue the writ court
for granting appropriate relief in the challenge to the order of
cancellation of their admission by the college in question.
7. With the above, the Letters Patent Appeal stands
dismissed. No order as to costs.
(SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ )
(D.N.RAY,J)
A. B. VAGHELA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Digitally signed by: ARUNA BHARATSINGH VAGHELA(HC01079), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/01/2026 11:04:30
Page 3 of 3
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.