Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

GUJARAT STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONversusNIDHI AKSHAYKUMAR JAIN (KALLUBHAI)

Decided
Disposal
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The stay order was set aside; the by‑elections must proceed as scheduled.

Summary

The Gujarat State Election Commission sought to stay the by‑elections for two councilor seats in Devgadh Bariya Municipality, arguing that the removal of the incumbents under Section 3 of the Gujarat Provisions of Disqualification of Members of Local Authorities for Defection Act, 1986 was being challenged before the writ court. The Single Judge had granted an interim stay, but on appeal the High Court examined whether a stay was justified given that the disqualification order was itself under challenge and that Section 42 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 mandates that vacancies be filled by election within six months. The Court found no justification to stay the elections, noting that the by‑elections must proceed and any later decision in the writ petition would affect the elected councilors. Consequently, the Court set aside the stay order for Seat No. 1 and Seat No. 4 of Ward No. 5, while reserving the merits of the disqualification challenge for the writ court. The order clarified that the appeal was allowed in part, but the Court did not adjudicate the substantive claims of the parties.

Issues considered

  • Whether a stay of by‑elections is justified pending a writ petition challenging the disqualification of councilors under the Defection Act, 1986.
  • Whether Section 42 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963, which requires by‑elections within six months of a vacancy, precludes a stay of the election process.
  • Whether the removal of councilors under Section 3 of the Gujarat Provisions of Disqualification Act, 1986, can be stayed pending judicial review.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • by‑election
  • stay order
  • disqualification
  • municipal law
  • Gujarat Municipalities Act
  • Defection Act
  • election law
  • writ petition

Judgment

    C/LPA/634/2026                                ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026




    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

        R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 634 of 2026
                           In
         R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/7850/2026
                          With
       CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2026
                           In
        R/LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 634 of 2026
=============================================
           GUJARAT STATE ELECTION COMMISSION
                          Versus
        NIDHI AKSHAYKUMAR JAIN (KALLUBHAI) & ORS.
=============================================
Appearance:
AISHVARYA(8018) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR GH VIRK, GOVERNMENT PLEADER with MS DHARITRI
PANCHOLI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 7
MR DEEPAK P SANCHELA(2696) for the Respondent(s) No. 8
MR DIPAN DESAI(2481) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4,5,6
=============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE
      SUNITA AGARWAL
      and
      HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY

                      Date : 27/07/2026
                        ORAL ORDER
            (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
               MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL)

  1. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and
     perused the record, we find no justification in staying the
     by-elections as per the schedule whereof, polling is to
     take place on 28.07.2026, when the learned Single Judge
     has passed the interim order on 23.07.2026, the date
     whereby all the stages of election process were over
     except polling.

  2. Moreover, the removal of the writ petitioners as
     Councilors      is   on     account     of       the      permanent
     disqualification under Section 3 of the Gujarat Provisions


                               Page 1 of 2
        C/LPA/634/2026                                                            ORDER DATED: 27/07/2026




         of Disqualification of Members of Local Authorities for
         Defection Act, 1986, which is subject matter of challenge
         before the writ Court.                            When the removal order itself
         was subject matter of challenge and in view of the
         mandate of Section 42 of the Gujarat Municipalities Act,
         1963, the by-elections for the vacant posts are to be
         completed within a period of six months from the date of
         occurrence of the vacancies, the petitioners cannot seek
         stay of the election process, on the premise that in case
         the elections are conducted, the writ petition would be
         rendered infructuous.

    3. In any case, elections as to the post of Councilor, held as
         by-elections, would be subject to the final outcome of the
         writ petition.

    4. In view of the above, we set aside the judgement and
         order dated 23.07.2026 passed by the learned Single
         Judge to the extent of challenge to stay/arrest of the
         election for Seat No.1 and Seat No.4 of Ward No.5 of
         Devgadh Bariya Municipality, by the order impugned.

    5. However, we may clarify that we have not entered into
         the merits of the claims of the parties, which would
         obviously be subject matter of consideration before the
         writ court.                 Detailed reasons for this decision shall
         follow.

                                                                    (SUNITA AGARWAL, CJ )


                                                                                                (D.N.RAY,J)
BIJOY B. PILLAI




                                                     Page 2 of 2
  Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
  Digitally signed by: BIJOY BALAKRISHNA PILLAI(HC00202), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/07/2026 15:04:24


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.