Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

M. N. PATEL - FORMER SALESMAN - SAPUTARA PETROL PUMPversusTHE GUJARAT STATE CIVIL SUPPLY CORPORATION

Disposal
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The court held that the Special Civil Application No. 16737 of 2010 must be restored to its original file.

Summary

M.N. Patel, a former salesman of Saputara Petrol Pump, filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking restoration of Special Civil Application No. 16737 of 2010, which had been dismissed. The respondents, Gujarat State Civil Supply Corporation and another, opposed the restoration. The court heard the parties and noted an assurance from the applicant’s counsel that the matter would be prosecuted if given an opportunity. Relying on paragraph 6(A) of the application, the court allowed the restoration and made the rule absolute. Consequently, the dismissed special civil application was reinstated to its original file and any interim relief in effect at the time of dismissal was revived until the next listing.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Special Civil Application No. 16737 of 2010 should be restored to the court file after its dismissal

Subjects

restoration of dismissed suitspecial civil applicationprocedural lawhigh court order

Judgment

     C/MCA/3122/2025                            ORDER DATED: 08/01/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR RESTORATION) NO. 3122 of 2025

                In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION/16737/2010

==========================================================
     M. N. PATEL - FORMER SALESMAN - SAPUTARA PETROL PUMP
                              Versus
      THE GUJARAT STATE CIVIL SUPPLY CORPORATION & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. NILAY A THAKER(7275) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR BHARAT SOLANKI for MR.NISARG P RAVAL(7262) for the Applicant(s)
No. 1
MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the Opponent(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT

                            Date : 08/01/2026

                              ORAL ORDER


1.    Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. H. S. Munshaw, learned

       Advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the

       opponent Nos.1 and 2.

2.    Heard learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties.

3.    Having heard learned Advocates appearing for the respective

       parties and after going through the averments made in the

       application and assurance given by Mr. Bharat Solanki,

       learned Advocate appearing for Mr. Nisarg P. Raval, learned

       Advocate for the applicant that if one opportunity will be



                                Page 1 of 2
            C/MCA/3122/2025                                                                   ORDER DATED: 08/01/2026




               given, the applicant will undertake to prosecute the matter.

    4.         The present application deserves to be allowed, which is hereby

               allowed in terms of paragraph No.6(A) of the application. Rule

               is made absolute accordingly.

    5.         It goes without saying that once the original matter is restored

               back on its file, whatever the interim relief, if any, operating as

               on the date of its dismissal will also revive and it will be

               operated, till the next listing date of the matter.

    6.         Consequently, the Special Civil Application No.16737 of 2010

               stands restored back on its original file.




                                                                                                (MAULIK J.SHELAT,J)
    NILESH

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PARMAR NILESHKUMAR R(HCD0068), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/01/2026 14:23:24




                                                              Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "restoration of dismissed suit"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.