High Court of Gujarat

JAINUM PROCON PVT. LTD.versusGUJARAT REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY

Disposal: 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
Bench: DIVYESH A JOSHI

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Jainum Procon Pvt. Ltd. appealed against Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority and others under the Gujarat RERA regime. The appellant's counsel failed to appear for the third scheduled hearing and made no alternative arrangements. The court observed that the appellant appeared unwilling to pursue the matter further. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. The notice was discharged and any interim relief previously granted was vacated.

Issues considered

Whether the appeal can proceed in the absence of the appellant's counsel and without any alternative arrangement?

Subjects

RERAappealprocedural defaultwant of prosecutioninterim relief vacated

Judgment

        C/RERAA/7/2025                                                             ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                               R/RERA APPEAL NO.                       7 of 2025

==========================================================
                      JAINUM PROCON PVT. LTD.
                               Versus
          GUJARAT REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RUTIK P DESAI(12360) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MS. KIRAN JITENDRAKUMAR VARYANI(17214) for the
Appellant(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Defendant(s) No. 1,2,3
==========================================================

    CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI

                                           Date : 16/07/2026

                                                  ORAL ORDER


          Even in third call, neither learned advocate for
the          appellant                  has           remained                 present                nor          any
alternative arrangement has been made on his behalf.
It seems that learned advocate for the appellant is
not desirous in proceeding further with the matter.
Hence,             the          appeal              is         dismissed                 for          want            of
prosecution. Notice discharged. Interim relief, if
any, stands vacated.

                                                                            (DIVYESH A. JOSHI,J)
LAVKUMAR J JANI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: LAVKUMAR JAYANTBHAI JANI(HC00210), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/07/2026 17:42:24




                                                      Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "RERA"Sign in to search