Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MOTANBEN ASHOKBHAI SAMUDRE THROUGH POA CHAGANBHAI DEVKISHANBHAI CHANDELversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the pending applications and directed that a fresh lease application be considered independently of the earlier rejection.

Summary

Hiteshbhai Kashinathbhai Patel filed two special civil applications seeking renewal of a lease granted by the State of Gujarat. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw these applications so that a fresh lease could be applied for under the State's new lease policy. The High Court examined whether the petitioner could withdraw the pending applications without prejudice to a new application. The Court granted the request, directing that any fresh lease application be considered on its own merits within six months and not be affected by the earlier rejection of the renewal. It further clarified that the earlier orders rejecting the lease renewal would not impede the fresh lease application. Consequently, both applications were disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw pending lease renewal applications to file a fresh application under a new policy.
  • Whether the earlier rejection of lease renewal should affect the consideration of a fresh lease application.

Subjects

  • lease renewal
  • withdrawal of petition
  • fresh lease application
  • state policy
  • administrative law

Judgment

          C/SCA/10064/2025                                                              ORDER DATED: 09/06/2026




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                     R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10064 of 2025
                                         With
                     R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10294 of 2025
  ==========================================================
                                HITESHBHAI KASHINATHBHAI PATEL
                                             Versus
                                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
  ==========================================================
  Appearance:
  MR. PARAM. S. DAVE(14217) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
  MR NIKUNJ KANARA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3
  ==========================================================
     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                                                  Date : 09/06/2026
                                                   ORAL ORDER
             Learned advocate, Mr.Param S. Dave, under instruction
  stated that he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions
  with a view to make fresh application for fresh lease under the
  new policy of the State Government.
             Permission, as prayed for, is granted. If any application
  for fresh lease is preferred, the same is directed to be
  considered in accordance with law, as early as possible and
  preferably within six months from the date of the application,
  without            being          influenced              by the             withdrawal               of present
  petitions.
             In view of above observation and direction, both these
  petitions are disposed of as withdrawn. It is clarified that
  earlier orders, whereby the renewal of the lease was rejected
  may not come in the way of the petitioner in being considered
  for fresh lease by way of fresh application and the same may
  be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law.



                                                                                           (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)
  R.S. MALEK

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RIYAZMIYA SABIRMIYA MALEK(HC00180), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/06/2026 15:05:42




                                                          Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.