Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

PULKITKUMAR SATHWARA S/O CHANDRAKANT SATHWARAversusTHE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

Decided
Disposal
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The petition was dismissed as the disciplinary inquiry was already concluded and the matter no longer fell within the scope of the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Pulkitkumar Sathwara, who is in jail, filed a special civil application challenging departmental proceedings. While the disciplinary inquiry was underway, an additional charge-sheet was issued, altering the nature of the charges. The respondent argued that the inquiry had already been completed and that the petition no longer pertained to the original charge-sheet. The court noted that the inquiry was concluded and no further order was necessary. Consequently, the petition was dismissed without any order as to costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petition challenging departmental proceedings can be entertained after the inquiry has been completed and a new charge-sheet has been issued

Subjects

  • departmental inquiry
  • charge-sheet
  • petition dismissal
  • disciplinary proceedings
  • court order

Judgment

   C/SCA/11091/2025                                     ORDER DATED: 05/02/2026




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.                      11091 of 2025

=====================================================
    PULKITKUMAR SATHWARA S/O CHANDRAKANT SATHWARA
                        Versus
          THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER & ANR.
=====================================================
Appearance:
MR. KM ANTANI(6547) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR ANUJ K TRIVEDI(6251) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR HAMESH C NAIDU(5335) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=====================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                             Date : 05/02/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER

  1. Learned advocate Mr. Hamesh Naidu, appearing for

     respondent No. 2, apprises the Court that the

     petitioner is in jail, which is not disputed by

     learned advocate Mr. K. M. Antani, appearing for

     the petitioner.



  2. It was submitted by learned advocate Mr. Hamesh

     Naidu            that     departmental            proceedings           were

     initiated and, after some progress therein, an

     additional              charge-sheet        was     issued        to         the

     petitioner, whereby certain additional charges


                                   Page 1 of 2
       C/SCA/11091/2025                                                          ORDER DATED: 05/02/2026




          were levelled against the petitioner. In view

          thereof, as the nature of the charge-sheet has

          now changed and, according to learned advocate

          Mr. Hamesh Naidu, the entire inquiry has also

          been            completed,                   there            is          no         point             in

          entertaining                  this         petition,               as      the       additional

          charge-sheet is not the subject matter of the

          present petition. It is further submitted that

          the inquiry has already been concluded and only

          an        appropriate                    order            pursuant               thereto               is

          required               to       be       passed             by       the         disciplinary

          authority.



     3. In view of the developments stated hereinabove,

          no further order is required to be passed in

          this petition, as the inquiry is already over.

          Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Notice

          is discharged. No order as to costs.


                                                                           (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)
Pallavi



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PALLAVIBEN PRABHUDAS PANCHAL(HC01403), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 05/02/2026 18:24:44




                                                    Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.