Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SAMSON CLEMENT CHRISTIANversusUNION OF INDIA

Decided
Disposal
26-DISMISSED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed Special Civil Application No. 11520 of 2019 against the Union of India and others. The High Court directed the petitioner to appear personally or arrange representation. The petitioner neither appeared nor engaged any counsel. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and the notice was discharged.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear or appoint counsel after a court direction?

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • special civil application
  • non-appearance
  • court order

Judgment

      C/SCA/11520/2019                                                    ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11520 of 2019

==========================================================
                              SAMSON CLEMENT CHRISTIAN
                                        Versus
                                 UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS ARCHANA U AMIN(2462) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3,5,7
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M.
        PRACHCHHAK

                                         Date : 20/04/2026

                                                ORDER


         It seems that the matter is pending since 2019 and though
this Court had issued notice to the petitioner and directed either
to remain personally present or make some alternative
arrangement, however, today, neither the petitioner has
personally remained present before the Court nor he has
engaged any lawyer to conduct the matter. It seems that the
petitioner is not interested to proceed with the matter.

         In view of the above, the petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution. Notice is discharged.

                                                              (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
ANUSRI



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANUSRI VASU(HC02352), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 20/04/2026 17:43:49




                                               Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.