Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

NRUPESH NARENDRABHAI TALATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
Disposal
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The impugned order is quashed, and the respondent authorities are permitted to pass a fresh order in accordance with natural justice.

Summary

The petitioner, Nrupesh Naren­drabhai Talati, challenged an order passed by the State of Gujarat authorities, alleging that the order was never communicated to him. The respondent corporation contended that the lack of communication violated the principles of natural justice and sought permission for the authorities to issue a fresh order. The petitioner’s counsel raised no objection to the issuance of a fresh order following due process. The Court, without delving into the substantive merits of the dispute, quashed the impugned order on procedural grounds. It granted liberty to the respondent authorities to pass a new order in compliance with natural‑justice requirements and disposed of the application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the impugned order should be set aside on the ground that it was not communicated to the petitioner, thereby violating the principles of natural justice.

Subjects

  • natural justice
  • procedural fairness
  • quash order
  • administrative law
  • high court

Judgment

      C/SCA/1346/2026                                    ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

              R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1346 of 2026

==========================================================
                         NRUPESH NARENDRABHAI TALATI
                                    Versus
                           STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MANISH J PATEL(2131) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS SUMAN MOTLA, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR NANDISH Y CHUDGAR(2011) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
==========================================================

  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRAL R. MEHTA

                            Date : 28/04/2026

                                  ORAL ORDER


                Learned       Advocate            Mr.Chudgar          for          the
respondent – Corporation candidly submitted that
the averments made in the petition are true to
the effect that the order was not communicated to
the     petitioner.           He,    therefore,           requested           this
Court to permit the authorities to pass fresh
order       by      following       the      principles          of      natural
justice,           to     which     Learned         Advocate          for          the
petitioner has no objection.

                In view of above, the impugned order is
hereby quashed without entering into the merits
of     the      case,       with    liberty         in    favour         of        the
respondent              authorities     to        pass   fresh        order        in


                                    Page 1 of 2
       C/SCA/1346/2026                                                          ORDER DATED: 28/04/2026




accordance with law following the principles of
natural justice.

                   Disposed of accordingly.

                                                                          (NIRAL R. MEHTA,J)
ANUP

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ANUP VYOMESH PARIKH(HC00956), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 28/04/2026 16:37:27




                                                    Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.