MAGANLAL MOHANLAL FALDUversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
- Bench
- DIVYESH A JOSHI
Holding
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's counsel's non‑appearance.
Summary
The petitioner, Maganlal Mohanlal Faldu, filed a special civil application before the High Court of Gujarat. The petition sought relief against the State of Gujarat and others. During the second hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Bharat T. Rao, failed to appear despite being called. The court held that the petition could not proceed in the absence of the petitioner’s representation and dismissed it for default. Consequently, the notice issued to the respondents was discharged and any interim relief previously granted was vacated.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner's counsel fails to appear for a scheduled hearing?
Subjects
Judgment
C/SCA/13925/2017 ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13925 of 2017
=======================================================
MAGANLAL MOHANLAL FALDU
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
=======================================================
Appearance:
MR BHARAT T RAO(697) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS SURBHI BHATI AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
=======================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI
Date : 10/02/2026
ORAL ORDER
Even in second call, learned advocate, Mr. Rao for
the petitioner has not remained present. Hence, this
petition stands dismissed for default for want of
prosecution. Notice is discharged. Interim relief, if
any, stands vacated.
(DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.)
Gautam
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: GAUTAM G PATIL(HC00190), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/02/2026 14:13:17
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.