Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

RATHOD ZARINABEN SAFIMAHAMMADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
Disposal
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The Court directed the respondents to decide the representation by 30 April 2026 and disposed of the petition as withdrawn, without adjudicating its merits.

Summary

The petitioner, Rathod Zarinaben Safimahammad, filed a special civil application seeking a direction to the State of Gujarat and other respondents to decide a representation made by her on 4 July 2025, which she alleged remained pending. The petitioner’s counsel argued that in the absence of a decision, the court should order the respondents to adjudicate the representation within a reasonable time, and offered to withdraw the petition if such direction were granted. The Court, after hearing the submissions, granted the prayer and ordered the petition to be withdrawn, directing the respondents to pass a reasoned order on the representation no later than 30 April 2026. The judgment expressly noted that the court had not examined the merits of the representation and that the petitioner could challenge any adverse decision thereafter. No costs were awarded, and the order was signed by Justice Nirzar S. Desai.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court should direct the respondent authorities to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 04‑07‑2025 within a specified time
  • Whether the petition can be withdrawn upon such direction without the court examining the merits

Subjects

  • representation
  • administrative law
  • court direction
  • withdrawn petition
  • High Court of Gujarat

Judgment

     C/SCA/14409/2025                                         ORDER DATED: 30/01/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14409 of 2025

==========================================================
                        RATHOD ZARINABEN SAFIMAHAMMAD
                                     Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR GAURAV K MEHTA(5227) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS NALANDA ACHARYA, GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s)
No. 1,2,3,4
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                                    Date : 30/01/2026

                                     ORAL ORDER


1.     At the outset, learned Advocate, Mr. Mehta, appearing

for the petitioner submitted that the representation dated

04.07.2025 made by the petitioner has not been decided by

the Respondent-authorities, yet. He, therefore, submitted

that this Court may direct the Respondent-authorities to

consider and decide the representation of the petitioner,

Dated: 04.07.2025, within some reasonable time and in that

case, under the instructions, he would withdraw this

petition.



2.     Heard.           In   view     of   the        above    submission,              the

permission, as prayed for, is granted. This petition stands


                                        Page 1 of 2
         C/SCA/14409/2025                                                    ORDER DATED: 30/01/2026




  disposed of, as withdrawn, at this stage. The Respondent-

  authorities are directed to decide the representation made

  by the petitioner, Dated: 04.07.2025, by passing a reasoned

  order and as early as possible, but, in any case not later

  than 30th April, 2026.



  2.1       In case, if, the representation is decided against the

  petitioner, then, it shall be open to the petitioner to

  challenge such an action. It is clarified that this Court has

  not examined the merits of the matter. No order as to costs.


                                                                                (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)
  UMESH/-


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: CHAVDA UMESH(HC00203), Principal pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/01/2026 16:32:57




                                                  Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.