High Court of Gujarat

KASHISH TRADELINK PRIVATE LIMITEDversusGUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Decided: 12 January 2026
Disposal: 35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: ANIRUDDHA P MAYEE

Holding

The Court directed the petitioner to make a fresh representation within two weeks and ordered the respondent to decide it within four weeks, without addressing the merits of the case.

Summary

Kashish Tradelink Private Limited applied for a fresh representation seeking allotment of Plot No.10A in the GIDC, Pandesara, Surat, invoking the existing GIDC policy. The petitioner argued that an expeditious decision was required because Respondent No.2 had already begun construction on the same plot. The High Court, after hearing submissions, declined to consider the substantive merits of the allotment dispute. It directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation to Respondent No.1 within two weeks of the order. The Court further ordered Respondent No.1 to decide the representation on its merits within four weeks of receipt. No opinion on the underlying rights of the parties was expressed, and the matter was disposed accordingly.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner is entitled to make a fresh representation for allotment of the plot under the existing GIDC policy
Whether the Court should adjudicate the merits of the allotment dispute or limit its intervention to procedural directions

Subjects

industrial plot allotment
representation
GIDC policy
procedural direction
high court order

Judgment

        C/SCA/14940/2025                                                                   ORDER DATED: 12/01/2026




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                    R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14940 of 2025

==========================================================
                  KASHISH TRADELINK PRIVATE LIMITED
                                Versus
         GUJARAT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR RITESH AGRAWAL FOR MR VIJAY H PATEL(7361) for the Petitioner(s)
No. 1
RAJVI PATEL(9620) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

                                                   Date : 12/01/2026
                                                    ORAL ORDER

           After some submissions, learned advocate for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner shall make a fresh representation for
allotment of Plot No.10A situated in GIDC, Pandesara, Surat in
terms of the existing policy of the GIDC. He submits that if such
a representation is made, the same may be decided expeditiously
since the respondent No.2 has started construction on the same.
           Considering the submissions, the petitioner is directed to
make a fresh representation to the respondent No.1 within a
period of 2 weeks from today. If such a representation is made,
the respondent No.1 shall decide the same on its own merits and
in accordance with law within a period of 4 weeks from the date
of receipt of such representation.
           It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the
merits of the case nor any opinion is expressed thereon.
           Disposed of accordingly.

                                                                                  (ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE, J.)
KAUSHIK D. CHAUHAN
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: KAUSHIKKUMAR DINESHCHANDRA CHAUHAN(HC00197), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/01/2026 14:53:49




                                                           Page 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

Ritesh Agrawal