Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

KALUBHAI NATHABHAI OTIYA (PATEL)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

Holding

The petition is dismissed for default for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Kalubhai Nathabhai Otiya (Patel), filed a Special Civil Application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking relief against the State of Gujarat and other respondents. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Girish M. Das, failed to appear on the second call. No request for adjournment was made by the petitioner or any representative. The Court observed that the petitioner had not prosecuted the petition and therefore could not be allowed to proceed. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for default due to want of prosecution. The notice issued to the respondents was also discharged.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear for a scheduled hearing without seeking an adjournment?

Subjects

defaultcivil procedurepetition dismissedhigh court order

Judgment

             C/SCA/15433/2022                                                      ORDER DATED: 21/07/2026




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
                R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.                                   15433 of 2022

      =======================================================
                  KALUBHAI NATHABHAI OTIYA (PATEL)
                               Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
      =======================================================
      Appearance:
      MR GIRISH M DAS(2323) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
      MS HEMALI SONI AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
      NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5,6,7,8
      =======================================================

          CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI

                                             Date : 21/07/2026

                                                    ORAL ORDER

                Even in second call, when the matter was called

      out, neither learned advocate for the petitioners has

      not       remained            present           nor       anyone          has       requested             for

      adjournment on his behalf. Hence, the present petition

      stands dismissed for default for want of prosecution.

      Notice is discharged.



                                                                         (DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.)

      Gautam


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: GAUTAM G PATIL(HC00190), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 21/07/2026 14:24:12




                                                        Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "default"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.