High Court of Gujarat
VIKRAMSINH DAHYABHAI SODHA PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Decided
- Disposal
- 27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
- Bench
- NIRZAR S DESAI
Holding
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
Vikramsinh Dahyabhai Sodha Parmar filed a special civil application against the State of Gujarat and others. The petitioner sought relief, and the court considered a request to amend respondent No.5, the Administrator of the District Primary Committee, Nadiad. The court granted leave to amend respondent No.5 and directed that the representation dated 14‑10‑2024 be considered and a reasoned order be passed. Following this direction, the petitioner, through counsel, chose not to pursue the petition further and sought permission to withdraw. The court granted the permission, disposed of the petition as withdrawn, and expressly noted that it did not examine the merits of the case.
Issues considered
- Whether leave should be granted to amend respondent No.5 in the petition
- Whether the petition can be withdrawn without the court examining its merits
Subjects
- civil procedure
- amendment of parties
- withdrawal of petition
- high court order
Judgment
C/SCA/15795/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/03/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15795 of 2025
==========================================================
VIKRAMSINH DAHYABHAI SODHA PARMAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR VICKY B MEHTA(5422) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR MITUL GAUTAM AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
Date : 09/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Leave to amend respondent No. 5 is granted.
Accordingly, respondent No. 5, the Administrator, District
Primary Committee, Nadiad, is directed to consider and decide
the representation made by the petitioner dated 14.10.2024, in
accordance with law, by passing a reasoned order.
2. In view of the above directions, the learned advocate
appearing for the petitioner, upon instructions, does not press
this petition. Permission as prayed for is granted.
3. The present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. It
is made clear that this Court has not examined the merits of
the matter. Direct service is permitted.
(NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)
BHAVIN MEHTA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: BHAVINKUMAR DEVENDRABHAI MEHTA(HCW0108), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/03/2026 17:53:07
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.