High Court of Gujarat

RAMILABEN VIMALBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Bench: HEMANT M PRACHCHHAK

Holding

The petition is dismissed as it has become infructuous.

Summary

In a Special Civil Application No. 16034 of 2025, petitioner Ramilaben Vimalbhai Parmar sought relief against the State of Gujarat and others, contending that an execution order passed by the Labour Court had not been complied with. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the execution order had already been carried out and the amount due had been withdrawn, rendering the petition unnecessary. The learned counsel for the respondent, Mr. Mrunal Dholaria, AGP, did not contest this claim. The High Court examined whether the petition remained viable in light of the alleged compliance. Concluding that the execution order was indeed satisfied, the Court held the petition to be infructuous and consequently disposed of it, discharging the notice issued to the respondents.

Issues considered

Whether the petition is infructuous because the execution order has already been executed and the amount withdrawn

Subjects

execution orderinfructuous petitioncivil applicationLabour Courtdischarge of notice

Judgment

        C/SCA/16034/2025                                                                ORDER DATED: 05/02/2026




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16034 of 2025

==========================================
                 RAMILABEN VIMALBHAI PARMAR
                             Versus
                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================
Appearance:
MR JIGNESH D LAMBA(12891) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR YOGEN N PANDYA(5766) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR MRUNAL DHOLARIA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
==========================================

    CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

                                              Date : 05/02/2026

                                                   ORAL ORDER

           Mr.Yogen Pandya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the execution order passed by the concerned Labour Court was
already executed and the amount has already been withdrawn and,
therefore, the petition is become infructuous.

           In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of having
become infructuous. Notice is discharged.


                                                                     (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
V.R. PANCHAL


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: VIJAYKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PANCHAL(HC00171), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/02/2026 16:30:19




                                                         Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "execution order"Sign in to search