High Court of Gujarat
MODI NEHABEN KIRTI KUMAARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
- Bench
- MAULIK SHELAT
Holding
The petition was withdrawn and disposed, with interim relief vacated.
Summary
Petitioner Modi Nehaben Kirti Kumaar, through counsel, chose not to press the petition. The court granted the permission sought and disposed of the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, the notice was discharged and any interim relief previously granted was vacated.
Subjects
withdrawalpetitioninterim reliefcourt order
Judgment
C/SCA/16631/2016 ORDER DATED: 24/03/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16631 of 2016
=============================================
MODI NEHABEN KIRTI KUMAAR
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=============================================
Appearance:
HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR NIRAD D BUCH(4000) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS MANISHA LAVKUMAR, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH
MR KRUTIK PARIKH, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR HS MUNSHAW(495) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
=============================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT
Date : 24/03/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. At the outset, Mr.Nirad D. Buch, learned advocate for
the petitioner, under the oral instructions of the petitioner,
does not press the present petition.
2. The permission, as sought for, is granted.
3. This petition is disposed of, as withdrawn. Notice is
discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(MAULIK J. SHELAT, J)
GAURAV J THAKER
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: GAURAVKUMAR JANARDANBHAI THAKER(HC00951), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 24/03/2026 14:25:26
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "withdrawal"Sign in to search