High Court of Gujarat
PRAJIVAN APARTMENT CO. OPERATIV HOUSING SOCIETY LTDversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT
- Decided
- Disposal
- 47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH
- Bench
- NIKHIL S KARIEL
Holding
The petition is disposed as the dissenting members have consented to the scheme and no further action is required.
Summary
The petitioners, Prajivan Apartment Co. Operative Housing Society Ltd and others, sought relief against the State of Gujarat and other respondents concerning a redevelopment scheme. Respondents 3 to 5, who were dissenting members, submitted an affidavit indicating they have now consented to the scheme and that a tripartite agreement with the redeveloper exists. Both the petitioner's counsel and the respondents' counsel agreed that, in view of this consent, no further steps are required. The court took the additional affidavit on record and disposed of the petition. Liberty was reserved for both parties in case of any difficulty, and direct service was permitted.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition can be disposed of on the ground that dissenting members have consented to the redevelopment scheme under the tripartite agreement
Subjects
- tripartite agreement
- redevelopment scheme
- dissenting members
- special civil application
- petition disposal
Judgment
C/SCA/17533/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17533 of 2025
==========================================================
PRAJIVAN APARTMENT CO. OPERATIV HOUSING SOCIETY LTD & ORS.
Versus
THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR BHAVIN S RAIYANI(3855) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1,2,3,4
MR ADITYA PATHAK ASST. GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
Respondent(s) No. 1
MR DEEP D VYAS(3869) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR. JIT P PATEL(6994) for the Respondent(s) No. 3,4,5
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIKHIL S. KARIEL
Date : 13/08/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Bhavin Raiyani for the
petitioners, learned AGP Mr. Aditya Pathak for respondent
No.1 – State, learned advocate Mr. Deep Vyas for respondent
No.2 and learned advocate Mr. Jit Patel for respondent Nos.3
to 5.
2. Learned advocate Mr. Patel for respondent Nos.3 to 5
tenders copy of an affidavit by respondent Nos.3 to 5 and
would submit that in the instant petition, the respondent Nos.3
to 5, being the dissenting members, have now consented to the
scheme and whereas, nothing further remains to be done in
Page 1 of 2
C/SCA/17533/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/08/2026
the matter. Learned advocate would also draw the attention of
this Court, to the agreement entered into between the
respondent Nos.3 to 5 with the re-developer.
3. Learned advocate Mr.Raiyani would second the request
made by learned advocate Mr. Patel and would submit that, in
view of the tripartite agreement, nothing further is required to
be done.
4. Having regard to the same, the additional affidavit is
taken on record. The petition stands disposed of.
5. Liberty reserved in favour of both the parties in case of
difficulty.
6. Direct service is permitted.
(NIKHIL S. KARIEL,J)
NAIR SMITA V./28-SB
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SMITA VINU NAIR(HC00186), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 14/08/2026 10:48:26
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.