High Court of Gujarat
GADHVI DHIRUDAN GULABSANGversusDEPUTY COLLECTOR
- Disposal
- 43-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ FH
- Bench
- DIVYESH A JOSHI
Holding
The petitions were dismissed for default for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner failed to appear for the second hearing of his special civil applications, indicating a lack of intention to pursue the matters. The court noted the petitioner’s absence as a default in prosecution. Consequently, the court dismissed both applications for want of prosecution. The order also discharged the rule issued earlier. No substantive merits of the petitions were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a petition can be dismissed for default due to the petitioner’s failure to appear at the hearing
Subjects
default judgmentcivil procedurepetition dismissal
Judgment
C/SCA/2643/2009 ORDER DATED: 08/04/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2643 of 2009
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2656 of 2009
=======================================================
GADHVI SHAMBHUDAN HEMANTSANG
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR & ORS.
=======================================================
Appearance:
MR JV JAPEE(358) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS HIMANI SHAH AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 3
RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
=======================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI
Date : 08/04/2026
ORAL ORDER
Even in second call, learned advocate for the
petitioner is absent, which shows that he does not wish
to continue with the present proceedings.
Hence, the present petitions stand dismissed for
default for want of prosecution. Rule is discharged.
(DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.)
Gautam
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: GAUTAM G PATIL(HC00190), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/04/2026 15:15:03
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "default judgment"Sign in to search