Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SHAILESHKUMAR VIRCHANDRABHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Decided
Disposal
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The petition is disposed of after the re‑measurement confirmed the petitioner’s eligibility and the deposit was ordered to be refunded.

Summary

The petitioner, Shaileshkumaar VirchandRabhai Chauhan, challenged the height measurement recorded during a Physical Efficiency Test for a police recruitment, alleging it was incorrectly measured. The High Court directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.10,000 as a cost, after which the respondents were to arrange a re‑measurement of his height before a medical officer, with the process videographed. The petitioner initially failed to deposit the amount by the stipulated date, leading the Court to extend the deadline to 1 April 2026 and schedule a new re‑measurement on 2 April 2026. Upon re‑measurement, the petitioner’s height was recorded as 164.9 cm, qualifying him for the next round of selection, and the Court ordered the refund of the deposited amount. With these observations, the Court disposed of the petition without further order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to a re‑measurement of his height under the recruitment rules
  • Whether the condition of depositing Rs.10,000 as cost is valid and enforceable

Subjects

  • Physical Efficiency Test
  • height measurement
  • re‑measurement
  • police recruitment
  • court order
  • deposit refund
  • eligibility

Judgment

   C/SCA/3878/2026                         ORDER DATED: 06/04/2026




       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

    R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.         3878 of 2026

=====================================================
         SHAILESHKUMAR VIRCHANDRABHAI CHAUHAN
                         Versus
                STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=====================================================
Appearance:
P M BUCH(7383) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS NALANDA ACHARYA ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for
the Respondent(s) No. 1,2
=====================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                       Date : 06/04/2026

                          ORAL ORDER

  1. This Court, on 20.03.2026, passed the following

    order:

                “1. Learned advocate for the petitioner
                states   that   in    pursuance   to   the
                advertisement issued by the respondents
                for various posts, the petitioner appeared
                in the Physical Efficiency Test and his
                height was wrongly measured which was
                found not to be in accordance with the
                prescribed limit. It was also submitted by
                learned advocate for the petitioner that
                in the last recruitment, the height of the
                petitioner was found in accordance with
                the prescribed limit and was declared
                qualified for further examination.

                2. In view of the above, the petitioner
                seeks re-examination of measurement of
                height.   Learned   advocate  for   the


                            Page 1 of 4
 C/SCA/3878/2026                               ORDER DATED: 06/04/2026




              petitioner states that the petitioner is
              ready and willing to deposit a sum of
              Rs.10,000/- with the Registry of this
              Court towards the cost of this petition,
              which may be refunded only in case, if,
              the petitioner succeeds in this petition.

              3. In that view of the matter, issue
              Notice,   returnable   on   30.03.2026,   on
              condition   that   the    petitioner   shall
              deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- with the
              Registry of this Court on, or before,
              25.03.2026. Learned Assistant Government
              Pleader waives service of notice on behalf
              of the respondents.

              4. The petitioner is directed to remain
              present before the Medical Officer, GMERS
              Civil   Hospital,   Sola,   Ahmedabad   on
              27.03.2026 at 11.00 a.m., with the receipt
              of the amount of Rs.10,000/- deposited by
              him and only upon showing the receipt of
              the deposit of the said amount, the
              respondents are directed to make necessary
              arrangement for re-measurement of the
              height of the petitioner by the concerned
              Medical Officer and the entire exercise be
              videographed and a Report be produced
              before this Court on the returnable date,
              i.e. on 30.03.2026.

              5. In case, if, the petitioner fails to
              produce the receipt on the date fixed for
              re-measurement of height, the respondents
              shall be in no way under an obligation to
              re-measure the height of the petitioner.“


3. Thereafter, on 30.03.2026, passed the following

  order:

              “Learned   advocate        Mr.   P.M.    Buch      states



                           Page 2 of 4
 C/SCA/3878/2026                                      ORDER DATED: 06/04/2026




              that the order dated 20th March 2026 could
              not be complied with by the petitioner as
              he could not arrange the amount directed
              to be deposited. He further states that
              the said amount is now available with the
              petitioner and, therefore, the time limit
              may be extended. Accordingly, the time
              limit to deposit the amount is extended up
              to 1st April 2026.

              The petitioner is directed to appear
              before the Medical Officer, GMERS Civil
              Hospital, Sola, on 2nd April 2026 at 11:00
              a.m., along with the original receipt of
              the amount deposited before this Court.
              Upon remeasurement of the height of the
              petitioner, the report thereof shall be
              produced before this Court on 6th April
              2026.”


4. Pursuant to the above order, a report has been

  submitted             today     by       the       Chairman,          Police

  Recruitment Board, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar,

  indicating             that      upon        re-measurement,                  the

  petitioner’s height was found to be 164.9 cm and

  that he has therefore been declared qualified in

  the      physical       examination          and    is    permitted           to

  appear           in   the     next     round       of    selection            for

  recruitment to the posts of Police Sub Inspector

  and Lok Rakshak. A photocopy of the report dated

  04.04.2026            submitted       by     the    Chairman,         Police




                                 Page 3 of 4
        C/SCA/3878/2026                                                          ORDER DATED: 06/04/2026




          Recruitment Board, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar,

          is taken on record.


     5. The           amount             of        ₹10,000/-                deposited                 by       the

          petitioner                   pursuant                 to         the           order             dated

          20.03.2026 is directed to be refunded to the

          petitioner.


     6. With             the          above            observations,                      and         without

          expressing                   anything                 further,                 the          present

          petition stands disposed of.



                                                                            (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)


Pallavi


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PALLAVIBEN PRABHUDAS PANCHAL(HC01403), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/04/2026 17:40:49




                                                     Page 4 of 4


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.