Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

PRAVINBHAI HIPABHAI BAMBHANIYA (BHAKHALIYA)versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The court held that non‑removal of office objections by 8 May 2026 will lead to dismissal of the matters for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners Basan Pratapsinh Dhansinh & Ors. filed a special civil application against the State of Gujarat & Ors. The High Court of Gujarat, after hearing, issued an order directing that all office objections in the connected matters be removed on or before 8 May 2026. The court warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the matters for want of prosecution. No detailed factual background or substantive legal arguments were recorded in the order. The order was signed by Justice Nirzar S. Desai and circulated to the registry for placement in each connected matter.

Issues considered

  • Whether the connected matters should be dismissed for want of prosecution if office objections are not removed by the stipulated date

Subjects

civil procedureoffice objectionswant of prosecutioncourt orderhigh court

Judgment

    C/SCA/5378/2024                           ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

           R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5378 of 2024
                              With
 CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR WITHDRAWAL OF MATTER) NO. 1 of 2026
         In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5378 of 2024
                              With
           F/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3864 of 2026
                              With
           F/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4754 of 2026
                              With
           F/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4969 of 2026
                              With
           F/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4971 of 2026
                              With
           F/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5422 of 2026
                              With
           F/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5471 of 2026
==========================================================
                  BASAN PRATAPSINH DHANSINH & ORS.
                               Versus
                      STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance :
MR NK MAJMUDAR for the Petitioner.1.
MS VIDITA D JAYSWAL for the Petitioner No. 23,441
DS AFF.NOT FILED (N) for the Respondent No.
14,15,17,18,19,2,21,23,3,30,31,32,34,35,4,7,9
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MS RV ACHARYA for the Respondent No. 16
KAASH K THAKKAR for the Respondent No. 11,29,8
KRUPALI N BHATT for the Respondent No. 10
MR HS MUNSHAW for the Respondent No. 12,13,24,27,5,6
MR. DEVANG D DAVE for the Respondent No. 33
MR. HJ KARATHIYA for the Respondent No. 26
MR. NISARG N JAIN for the Respondent No. 20,28
MR. RADHESH Y VYAS for the Respondent No. 22
MS KIRAN D PANDEY for the Respondent No. 25
=========================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                         Date : 09/04/2026
                       COMMON ORAL ORDER


              Office objections to be removed on or before 8.5.2026
failing which the matter(s) shall stand dismissed for want of
prosecution without reference to the Court.




                               Page 1 of 2
        C/SCA/5378/2024                                                              ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026




                     Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in each
connected matters.

                                                                                  (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)



SAVARIYA

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RAJNISH NARENDRA SAVARIYA(HC00179), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/04/2026 17:45:23




                                                       Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "civil procedure"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.