High Court of Gujarat

NANJIBHAI SURAJI PARMAR (SINCE DECD) THROUGH WIFE HANSABEN NANJIBHAI PARMAR (THAKOR)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: DISPOSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Bench: HEMANT M PRACHCHHAK

Holding

The petition is disposed of as infructuous and the interim relief is vacated.

Summary

The petitioner, Nanjibhai Suraji Parmar (deceased) through his wife Hansaben, filed a Special Civil Application against the State of Gujarat and others seeking relief. During the pendency, the respondents complied with the Court's earlier direction dated 21‑05‑2025 by executing and registering a lease deed in favour of the petitioner on 11‑06‑2025. The petitioner’s counsel submitted the registered lease deed and argued that the petition had become infructuous. The Court noted that the matter was now moot and ordered the petition to be disposed without addressing the merits. Consequently, any interim relief previously granted was vacated.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate disposition of a petition that becomes moot after the respondents comply with a prior court direction?

Subjects

lease deedcompliance with court directioninfructuous petitioninterim reliefcivil procedure

Judgment

         C/SCA/6977/2025                                                                ORDER DATED: 16/03/2026




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6977 of 2025

==========================================
 NANJIBHAI SURAJI PARMAR (SINCE DECD) THROUGH WIFE HANSABEN
                   NANJIBHAI PARMAR (THAKOR)
                              Versus
                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================
Appearance:
MS KRUTI SHAH FOR MR JAY N SHAH(10668) for the Petitioner(s)
MR ADITYA DAVDA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2,3,4
==========================================
  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK

                                              Date : 16/03/2026

                                                   ORAL ORDER

           Ms.Shah, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during
the pendency of this petition, the respondents have complied with the
direction issued by this Court vide order dated 21.05.2025 and the
respondents have executed lease deed in favour of the petitioner and
the same was registered on 11.06.2025 and, therefore, the petition
has become infructuous. Ms.Shah, learned counsel has tendered the
copy of the lease deed which is taken on record.

           In view of the above, the petition stands disposed of as having
become infructious. Notice is discharged. Interim relief, if any, granted
earlier shall stand vacated forthwith.

           It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the
matter.

                                                                     (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
V.R. PANCHAL

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: VIJAYKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PANCHAL(HC00171), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 17/03/2026 10:51:13


                                                         Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "lease deed"Sign in to search