Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

ALANKRUTA R DAVEversusGujarat Ayurved University

Disposal
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

Holding

A writ petition is dismissible for non‑prosecution when the petitioner does not appear despite being called out twice.

Summary

The petitioner, Alankruta R. Dave, filed a special civil application before the High Court of Gujarat seeking relief against Gujarat Ayurved University and others. The petitioner failed to appear in court despite the matter being called out twice. The Court noted the non‑appearance and held that the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution and the notice was discharged. Any interim relief previously granted was vacated, and the Court indicated that a restoration application, if filed, would be considered with conditions including costs.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear after being called out twice.

Subjects

writ petitionnon‑prosecutiondismissalinterim reliefrestoration application

Judgment

          C/SCA/7011/2018                                                                  ORDER DATED: 05/03/2026




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                     R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7011 of 2018

 ==========================================================
                                           ALANKRUTA R DAVE
                                                  Versus
                                     Gujarat Ayurved University & ORS.
 ==========================================================
 Appearance:
 MR GAURAV CHUDASAMA(5660) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
 ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 MS DHRUTI PANDYA, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the
 Respondent(s) No. 4
 HARSHESH R KAKKAD(7813) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
 ==========================================================

    CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MAULIK J.SHELAT

                                                   Date : 05/03/2026

                                                      ORAL ORDER


 1.           Though twice the matter was called out, none present for the

              petitioner.

 2.           Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for non-

              prosecution. Notice is discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands

              vacated forthwith.

 3.           Further, if any restoration application will be filed in this

              matter, it shall be entertained by imposing appropriate

              conditions, including costs.


                                                                                             (MAULIK J.SHELAT,J)
 NILESH

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PARMAR NILESHKUMAR R(HCD0068), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 05/03/2026 14:35:20




                                                            Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "writ petition"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.