Created by Fuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

HITESH MANHARLAL GANDHIversusINFORMATION COMMISSIONER

Decided
Disposal
35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The petition is disposed of as not pressed because the information sought is publicly available and the petitioner has withdrawn the application.

Summary

The petitioner, Hitesh Manharlal Gandhi, filed a special civil application seeking information from the Information Commissioner and others. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Aditya A. Gupta, discovered that the requested information was already available on the websites of the bank and the Reserve Bank of India. On this basis, the petitioner chose not to press the petition, indicating that his grievance was satisfied. The Court, after noting the availability of the information, granted the petitioner's request for permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as not pressed. The order was signed by Justice Nirzar S. Desai on 10 July 2026.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate course of action when the information sought in a petition is already publicly available?

Subjects

  • Right to Information
  • public information
  • petition withdrawal
  • disposal
  • Information Commissioner

Judgment

            C/SCA/9477/2025                                                                  ORDER DATED: 10/07/2026




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                       R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9477 of 2025

   ==========================================================
                                     HITESH MANHARLAL GANDHI
                                              Versus
                                 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & ORS.
   ==========================================================
   Appearance:
   ADITYA A GUPTA(7875) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
   MR CHAITANYA S JOSHI(5927) for the Respondent(s) No. 4
   MR RITURAJ M MEENA(3224) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
   ==========================================================

      CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI

                                                     Date : 10/07/2026

                                                              ORDER


              In view of the fact that the information sought by the
   petitioner is available on the websites of the Bank and the
   RBI, learned advocate Mr. Aditya Gupta, upon instructions,
   does not press the present petition, as the grievance of the
   petitioner stands redressed.


              Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Accordingly, the
   present petition stands disposed of as not pressed.



                                                                                                 (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J)
   BHAVIN MEHTA




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: BHAVINKUMAR DEVENDRABHAI MEHTA(HCW0108), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE ONE, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/07/2026 17:33:23



                                                             Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.