High Court of Gujarat
HARUNBHAI VALIBHAI BAREJIYAversusCOLLECTOR OF RAJKOT
- Disposal
- 35-ANY OTHER MODE @ ADM.STAGE
- Bench
- M R MENGDEY
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
Harunbhai Valibhai Barejiya & Ors. filed a Special Criminal Application seeking a direction to lodge an FIR/complaint against the Collector of Rajkot & Ors. The petition was listed before the High Court of Gujarat, but the petitioner’s counsel was not present. The learned judge noted the absence and dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the application were considered. The order was signed and digitally recorded on 30 June 2025.
Issues considered
- Whether the petition can be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the petitioner’s counsel’s absence?
Subjects
Procedural lawCriminal Procedure CodeDismissal for want of prosecutionSpecial Criminal Application
Judgment
R/SCR.A/1310/2025 ORDER DATED: 30/06/2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION - TO LODGE
FIR/COMPLAINT) NO. 1310 of 2025
==========================================================
HARUNBHAI VALIBHAI BAREJIYA & ORS.
Versus
COLLECTOR OF RAJKOT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR PRASHANT V CHAVDA(8510) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MANAN MAHETA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 9
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR
Date : 30/06/2025
ORAL ORDER
When the matter is called out, learned advocate for the
petitioner is not present. Hence, present petition is dismissed for
want of prosecution.
(HASMUKH D. SUTHAR, J.)
Ajay
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: AJAY CHANDRAN MENON(HC00939), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/06/2025 18:08:55
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "Procedural law"Sign in to search