Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

HEMANTSINH PREMSINH PAWARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to grant a 21‑day parole extension on condition of a Rs 25,000 bond and surety.

Summary

Hemantsinh Prem​sin​h Pawar applied to the Gujarat High Court for an enlargement of his parole leave. The applicant, represented by Ms. Dipika P. Bajpai, sought a further period of release, while the State, represented by Mr. Rohan Raval, opposed the request. The court examined the jail remarks and the grounds raised in the application and exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant. It ordered that the applicant be released on parole for 21 days, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with an equal surety and reporting to the police station on alternate days. The order also barred any further extension of parole or any application to reduce the bail amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to an extension of parole leave
  • Whether the court may impose a bond, surety and reporting conditions on the parole

Subjects

parolebailcriminal procedurehigh courtdiscretionsuretybond

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/1398/2026                                 ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 1398 of
                               2026

==========================================================
                          HEMANTSINH PREMSINH PAWAR
                                     Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
Ms DIPIKA P BAJPAI(8365) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
       DESAI

                                Date : 10/02/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER


1.      The present application is                led by the applicant for

        enlarging him on Parole Leave on the ground mentioned in

        the application.

2.      Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP

        appearing on behalf of the Respondent – State.

3.      Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of

        Rule on behalf of the respondent-State.

4.      Having considering the jail remarks and ground mentioned

        in the Application, this Court is inclined to exercise

        discretion in favour of the applicant.

5.      This application is partly allowed. The applicant is ordered

        to be released on Parole Leave for a period of 21 days from

                                    Page 1 of 2
     R/SCR.A/1398/2026                                                    ORDER DATED: 10/02/2026




        the date of actual release, upon furnishing a personal bond

        of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with a

        surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the jail

        authority, and on further conditions that the Applicant

        should mark his presence before the concerned police

        station on every alternate day, till the expiry of the Parole

        Leave Period.

6.      The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. It is

        hereby clari ed that no further extension shall be granted

        and further the Court shall not entertain any application for

        reduction of amount of Bail bond and surety. Rule is made

        absolute.


                                                      (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
ANIRUDH OJHA




 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
 Digitally signed by: ANIRUDH OJHA(HC02370), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/02/2026 18:17:47




                                               Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.