ADIL FAYUMBHAI DERDIVALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION
- Bench
- M R MENGDEY
Holding
The application was dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s counsel’s non‑appearance.
Summary
The petitioner, Adil Fayumbhai Derdivala, filed a Special Criminal Application (Direction) before the Gujarat High Court seeking relief against the State of Gujarat and others. The matter was listed for hearing on 8 July 2026. The petitioner’s counsel, Nabil O. Bloch, was not present when the matter was called out. The Court observed that the petitioner’s advocate’s non-appearance amounted to a failure to prosecute the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when the petitioner’s counsel fails to appear for a listed hearing?
Subjects
Judgment
R/SCR.A/14093/2025 ORDER DATED: 08/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 14093 of 2025
==========================================================
ADIL FAYUMBHAI DERDIVALA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
NABIL O BLOCH(7953) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Date : 08/07/2026
ORDER
Learned advocate for the petitioner is not present when the matter is
called out.
Hence, the matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(M. R. MENGDEY,J)
Manshi
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: AMIN MANSI(HC01561), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/07/2026 10:50:27
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.