Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

ANILKUMAR MORARILAL DUBE THRO RAHUL ANILKUMAR DUBEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to grant parole leave for medical treatment, subject to a personal bond, sureties, and reporting conditions, without allowing any extension or reduction of the bond.

Summary

The petitioner, Anilkumar Morarilal Dube, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for the purpose of his medical treatment. The application was presented before the High Court of Gujarat, with counsel Ms. Alpa J. Dave representing the petitioner and Mr. Vinay Vishen, Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the State. After considering the grounds raised and the facts and circumstances of the case, the court exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. The court ordered the release of the petitioner on parole for a period of 21 days, subject to a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 and two sureties of equal amount, and required him to report to the police station every alternate day. The order also stipulated that the petitioner must surrender at the end of the parole period and submit medical documents, and it expressly barred any extension or reduction of the bond amount. The application was therefore allowed on the terms specified.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave for medical treatment under the applicable criminal procedure provisions?
  • Whether the court may impose a personal bond, sureties, and reporting conditions as part of the parole grant?

Subjects

parolemedical treatmentcriminal procedurepersonal bondsuretycourt discretion

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/2009/2026                             ORDER DATED: 12/02/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 2009 of
                               2026
==========================================================
      ANILKUMAR MORARILAL DUBE THRO RAHUL ANILKUMAR DUBE
                             Versus
                   STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS ALPA J DAVE(3924) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR VINAY VISHEN, ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s)
No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
       DESAI

                             Date : 12/02/2026

                              ORAL ORDER


1.               The present application is       led by the applicant

for enlarging him on parole leave for the purpose of his

own treatment.



2.      Rule returnable forthwith.               Learned APP waives

service of rule on behalf of the respondent State.



3.      Having considered the ground mentioned in the

application and considering the facts and circumstance of

the case, this court is inclined to exercise discretion in



                                 Page 1 of 2
         R/SCR.A/2009/2026                                                    ORDER DATED: 12/02/2026




 favour of the applicant.



 4.        The applicant is ordered to be released on parole for

 a period of 21 days from the date of his actual release,

 upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees

 Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of like

 amount to the satisfaction of the jail authority, and on a

 further condition that the applicant shall mark his

 presence before the concerned police station every

 alternate day. He shall surrender to the jail authorities

 on expiry of the parole period, and on surrender he shall

 submit the medical case papers of the treatment which he

 undergoes during the period of his parole leave.                                                      It is

 clari ed that, no extension shall be granted on expiry of

 the parole period and this court shall also not entertain

 application for reduction of amount of personal bond and

 surety.            The application is allowed in the aforesaid

 terms. Rule is made absolute accordingly. Direct service

 is permitted.


                                                         (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
 DIVYA

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: DIVYA NAIR(HC00199), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/02/2026 17:30:51
                                                  Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.