High Court of Gujarat

TAKHATSINH BHAILALBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI

Holding

The application for parole leave was rejected.

Summary

Takhatsinh Bhailalbhai Solanki applied for parole leave, citing arrangement of money as the ground. The court noted that the applicant had been sentenced for non-payment of maintenance to his wife. Considering the jail remarks and the nature of the offence, the court found no merit in the applicant's claim. It held that exercising discretion in favour of the applicant would be inappropriate. Consequently, the application for parole leave was rejected.

Issues considered

Whether parole leave can be granted to a convict sentenced for non-payment of maintenance to his wife
Whether the court should exercise discretion in favour of the applicant under the given circumstances

Subjects

parolemaintenancecriminal procedurediscretionsentencing

Judgment

        R/SCR.A/2111/2026                                                                     ORDER DATED: 12/02/2026




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

    R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 2111 of
                              2026

==========================================================
                                 TAKHATSINH BHAILALBHAI SOLANKI
                                             Versus
                                    STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR VINAY VISHEN, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
         DESAI

                                                    Date : 12/02/2026

                                                       ORAL ORDER

            The Applicant has filed this Application for grant of Parole
Leave on the ground of arrangement of money.
            Considering the jail remarks it appears that the applicant has
been sentenced for non-payment of maintenance amount to his
wife. Hence it does not deem fit to exercise discretion in favour of
the applicant.                 Considering the same, no ground is made out. The
Application is rejected.




                                                                     (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
KAJAL




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA(HCD0076), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/02/2026 17:31:30




                                                             Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search