Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MEHULBHAI RAJUBHAI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application for furlough leave was rejected.

Summary

The petitioner, Mehulpur Rajubhai Thakor, filed a special criminal application seeking furlough (parole) leave. The State, represented by Mr. Tirthraj Pandya, informed the court that the petitioner had previously been released on parole for ten days (24‑09‑2025 to 03‑10‑2025) and that the current application was rejected because no surety had been furnished. The court examined the applicant’s request and the State’s submission. Considering the lack of a surety and the applicant’s recent parole history, the court exercised its discretion against granting the leave. Consequently, the application for furlough leave was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to be granted furlough (parole) leave in the absence of a surety

Subjects

parolefurlough leavesuretycriminal procedurehigh court

Judgment

         R/SCR.A/2796/2026                                                                      ORDER DATED: 26/02/2026




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (FURLOUGH LEAVE) NO. 2796 of
                              2026

 ==========================================================
                                       MEHULBHAI RAJUBHAI THAKOR
                                                 Versus
                                        STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
 ==========================================================
 Appearance:
 THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
 ==========================================================

     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE UTKARSH THAKORBHAI
           DESAI

                                                      Date : 26/02/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER
             The Applicant has filed this Application for grant of Parole
 Leave on the ground mentioned in the application.
             Heard learned APP Mr. Tirthraj Pandya on behalf of the
 respondent – State, who has submitted that, the applicant was
 lastly released for 10 days on Parole Leave from 24.09.2025 to
 03.10.2025. His Furlough Application rejected since none came
 forward to stand a surety.
             In the event, this Court is not inclined to exercise discretion
 in favour of the applicant as of now. The Application is rejected.




                                                                       (UTKARSH THAKORBHAI DESAI, J)
 KAJAL




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: KAJAL KISHORBHAI NAVLAKHA(HCD0076), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 26/02/2026 15:23:36




                                                              Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.