High Court of Gujarat
NAKUM JAMAN MAVJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Decided
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- D N RAY
Holding
The condition to deposit the entire cheque amount for condonation of delay is onerous and must be modified to a reasonable quantum, here fixed at 20% of the cheque value.
Summary
The petitioner was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonoured cheque of Rs.9,30,000 and appealed the conviction. Along with the appeal, the petitioner filed a C.R.M.A. seeking condonation of delay, which the trial judge allowed but imposed a condition that the petitioner deposit the full cheque amount. The petitioner challenged this condition as onerous before the High Court. The Court examined the reasonableness of the condition and held that requiring the entire amount was excessive. Consequently, the Court set aside the original condition and modified it, directing the petitioner to deposit only 20% of the cheque amount as a condition for condonation of delay.
Issues considered
- Whether the condition directing the petitioner to deposit the entire cheque amount as a prerequisite for condonation of delay is legally permissible and reasonable.
Legislation cited
- Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — s. 138
Subjects
- Section 138 NI Act
- condonation of delay
- cheque bounce
- excessive condition
- modification of order
- High Court
- Gujarat
Judgment
R/SCR.A/6720/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/05/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 6720 of 2026
==========================================================
NAKUM JAMAN MAVJI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. HARDIK B KORADIYA(9955) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
RULE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY
Date : 27/05/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Hardik Koradiya for the
applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor
Ms. Maithili Mehta for the respondents.
2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has
challenged the order dated 27.04.2026 passed by the
learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Devbhumi
Dwarka at Khambhalia in C.R.M.A. No. 151 of 2026,
whereby while allowing the application for condonation of
delay, the learned Judge imposed a condition directing
deposit of the entire cheque amount of Rs. 9,30,000/-.
Page 1 of 3
R/SCR.A/6720/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/05/2026
3. The facts of the case are that a complaint was filed by the
complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as “the NI
Act”) on account of dishonour of the cheque issued by the
petitioner.
4. The petitioner preferred an appeal against the order of
conviction. Along with the appeal, an application being
C.R.M.A. No. 151 of 2026 for condonation of delay was
filed. The learned Principal District & Sessions Judge,
Devbhumi Dwarka at Khambhalia allowed the said
application; however, while doing so, imposed a condition
directing the petitioner to deposit the entire cheque amount
of Rs. 9,30,000/-.
5. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the aforesaid order,
the present petition has been filed.
Page 2 of 3
R/SCR.A/6720/2026 ORDER DATED: 27/05/2026
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the
impugned condition directing deposit of the entire cheque
amount appears to be onerous and excessive. Interest of
justice would be served if a modified condition is imposed.
7. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The impugned
condition directing deposit of the entire cheque amount is
hereby set aside and modified. Instead, the petitioner is
directed to deposit 20% of the cheque amount as a
condition for condonation of delay before the learned trial
Court . Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Direct service is permitted.
(D.N.RAY,J)
JYOTI V. JANI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: JYOTIBEN VINODKUMAR JANI(HC00213), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/05/2026 15:00:33
Page 3 of 3
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.