Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

THE COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE COMMISSIONERATEversusM/S JALARAM STEEL FURNITURE PVT. LTD.

Disposal
46-ANY OTHER MODE @ FH

Holding

The appeal is not maintainable because the tax effect is below the Rs.2 crore threshold prescribed in Circular No.9 of 2024.

Summary

The Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise filed a tax appeal against M/s Jalaaram Steel Furniture Pvt. Ltd. The appellant argued that the tax effect in the appeal was less than Rs.2 crores. The respondent contended that the appeal should be maintainable. The Court examined Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17 September 2024, which stipulates that tax appeals with a tax effect below Rs.2 crores are not maintainable. Finding that the tax effect indeed fell below the threshold, the Court held that the appeal could not be entertained. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of, with liberty to revive only if a difficulty arises.

Issues considered

  • Whether a tax appeal with a tax effect of less than Rs.2 crores is maintainable under Circular No.9 of 2024

Subjects

tax appealCGSTCircular No.9 of 2024low tax effectmaintainability

Judgment

       C/TAXAP/313/2020                                                       ORDER DATED: 22/01/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                            R/TAX APPEAL NO. 313 of 2020

=============================================
                THE COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE
                             COMMISSIONERATE
                                  Versus
                   M/S JALARAM STEEL FURNITURE PVT. LTD.
=============================================
Appearance:
MR DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(7781) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR HASIT DAVE(1321) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
=============================================
   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA
         and
         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI

                    Date : 22/01/2026
                      ORAL ORDER
   (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. SUPEHIA)


          Learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the
applicant submitted that the tax e6ect in this appeal is less
than Rs.2 crores and as per the Circular No.9 of 2024 dated
17.09.2024 this Tax Appeal would not be maintainable.

          In view of the above statement, the Tax Appeal is
disposed of on the ground of low tax e6ect with a liberty to
revive in case of di=culty.

                                                                                         Sd/-
                                                                                 (A. S. SUPEHIA, J)


                                                                                    Sd/-
                                                                             (PRANAV TRIVEDI,J)
MAHESH/26

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges.
Digitally signed by: MAHESH OMPRAKASH BHATI(HC01086), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 22/01/2026 17:33:49




                                                  Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "tax appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.