Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 20201–20400
The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal that was originally due in 2016. The appeal was not presented before the stipulated date, and the matter was listed under the caption of dismissal. The applicant argued that the delay was due to circumstances beyond …
The applicant filed Civil Revision Application No.251 of 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. The matter was listed before Justice K.K. Tated on June 7, 2017. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called out. The court noted the applicant's non‑appearance and …
The petitioner, Rajkumar Bhanudas Dhurgude, challenged the cancellation of his life membership in the Maharashtra Sahitya Parishad, alleging it was retaliatory for his criticism of alleged mismanagement and election rigging. The petition also raised concerns about the conduct of the upcoming trust …
Rahul Bhausaheb Gulave filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel sought leave to withdraw the bail application, requesting permission to file a fresh application after six months. The State of Maharashtra was represented by counsel B. B. Kulkarni. The Court …
The Applicants filed a criminal application seeking the court to call for investigation papers and to quash the charge sheet filed under Sections 395, 458 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code in FIR No. 198 of 2019. They alleged that the investigation papers were improperly seized and that the charge …
The petitioners, including the husband, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of FIR No. 424 of 2018 registered at Malad Police Station under Sections 498A, 406, 420, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and the …
The petition under Article 227 challenged a Civil Judge's order admitting several unregistered sale‑cum‑development agreements as exhibits. The defendants argued that Section 49(c) of the Registration Act, 1908 barred such admission because the documents were unregistered and the suit was not for …
The applicant, Vishal Balasaheb Shivale, filed an anticipatory bail application and sought correction of a clerical error in the order dated 28 January 2026, where the police station was incorrectly named as “MIDC Police Station, District- Ahilyanagar.” Counsel for the applicant argued that the …
A criminal writ petition (No. 236 of 2026) was filed by Amit S. Wagmare against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the scheduled hearing dates of 27 and 28 January 2026. The court noted the absence of representation for the petitioner. …
The Union of India, Ministry of Defence filed Writ Petition No. 3821 of 2025 in the Bombay High Court challenging the legality and propriety of an order dated 08/06/2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal in Original Application No. 119 of 2021. The petitioner sought to have the Tribunal's order …
The petitioner, Hirabai Pandurang Mokal, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner died on 9 November 2025. An interim application was filed by the petitioner’s sole legal heir seeking substitution as the petitioner to …
Petitioner Pankaj R. Verma filed a writ petition challenging a statutory notice issued by ICICI Bank under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, alleging it and the subsequent possession notice were illegal. The …
Mohd Aijaz Mohd Suleman Shaikh appealed the order dated 15 January 2019 that rejected his civil application at the interim hearing stage. The appellant argued that his substantive suit against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai was already at the evidence stage, rendering the civil …
Vikram filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Union of India. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, sought a pass‑over to take instructions. Subsequently, the petitioner decided to withdraw the petition. The court considered the petitioner's request …
The applicant, Mahadya @ Mahadev Dundappa Dindure, was granted bail by the High Court on 28 January 2026. The bail order failed to mention Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(4) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, which were pleaded and listed in the charge‑sheet. The applicant’s counsel …
The petitioner, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging orders of the Small Causes Court that directed common recording of evidence in two related suits (L.D. Suit No. 52 of 2008 and L.E.&C. Suit No. 142 of 2016) and allegedly shifted the burden of proof onto the …
The petitioner, Vaishali Anil Tikam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quash of FIR No. 348 of 2017 and the pending chargesheet (Sessions Case No. 169 of 2018). The complainant (Respondent No.2) …
The petitioner, Vaishali Anil Tikam, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a writ of certiorari to quash FIR No. 188 of 2025 registered under Sections 406, 408, 409, 420, 34 IPC and Section 1860. After …
Isha Suresh Chauhan filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Edgar Briganza, sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting liberty to file a fresh application after charges are framed or after six months, whichever is earlier. The court, …
The applicant, Okechukwu Okeke Linus, filed a bail application while in custody since 12 April 2024. Counsel for the applicant sought the court's permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw and disposed of the bail application as withdrawn. …
The petitioner, Shubham Prakash Jejurkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, the parties reached a mutual settlement before the trial court. On 27 January 2026, a praecipe was filed requesting withdrawal of the petition. …
The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed a criminal revision against M/s Sawantwadi Lunch-Home for alleged non‑payment of statutory ESI contributions, seeking to overturn an acquittal granted by the Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 85(a) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, …
Kuldeep Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a 2018 fraud case (Crime No.164) involving alleged impersonation of government officials and cheating Rs.59 lakh, punishable under IPC sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 506 read with 34. The prosecution alleged his participation, while …
The petitioner, Sandeep Holkar, challenged the rejection of his claim to belong to the Koli Mahadev Scheduled Tribe, arguing that his close blood relative, Dattatray Arjun Holkar, had been issued a valid caste certificate in 2003 and his cousin in 2009. The Scrutiny Committee had denied his claim, …
The petitioners, a 100% grant‑in‑aid school, dismissed a teacher (Respondent No.1) in 2020 on the ground of alleged misconduct for providing false information about the number of his children, invoking the Maharashtra Civil Services (Declaration of Small Family) Rules, 2005. The School Tribunal …
The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a civil miscellaneous appeal (No. 672 of 2008) decided by the District Court. The court clerk retrieved the case status from the website, which showed that the appeal had already been disposed of. Since the subject matter of the petition was already …
The petitioner, Harshali Akash Solwande, challenged the rejection of her nomination for the Takari Panchayat Samiti SC (Female) seat on the ground that the Returning Officer had not accepted her Form II, a document required under the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Panchayat Samiti (Electoral Division & …
The petitioner, Dajiram Govind Katare, filed a public interest litigation seeking to shift the scheduled election date from 5 February 2026 to 6 February 2026, citing past precedents where election dates were moved to avoid clashes with local festivities. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court …
Mubarak Rahematulla Maniyar was serving a 24‑year imprisonment and was released on 26 March 2022 after completing his term, including remissions. He filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 416 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The Respondent State, through its Assistant Public …
The petitioner, Bhagwan Vaiku Shelar, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. During the pendency of the case, the petitioner died in March 2024. No legal heirs or representatives appeared before the Court to take over the petition. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that there were no …
The applicant, accused in a criminal case (C.C. No.2358/PW/2023) under sections 389 and 504 of the IPC, filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashal of the proceeding. The applicant and Respondent No.2 had settled their dispute, and Respondent No.2 submitted a notarised consent …
Manasi Inamdar filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. 0385/2023 registered for offences under Sections 279 and 337 of the IPC. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a chargesheet had been filed. The petitioner, through counsel, requested permission to …
The Kohinoor Cooperative Housing Society challenged the order of the Appellate Authority that directed it to admit Shabnoor Ayub as a member under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The dispute arose because the deceased father of the respondent had been treated as a member and had …
Petitioner Poonam Kaur filed a writ petition alleging that Respondent No.2 had published defamatory statements about her on various social media platforms and sought a restraining order against Respondent No.2 and Respondents 3, 4 and 5. The High Court examined whether such relief could be granted …
The High Court heard a letters patent appeal (No.10 of 2011) filed by Ambarnath Sahakari Samudaik Shetki Society Limited and others against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, counsel for the State pointed out an error in paragraph 20 of the Court's earlier judgment, specifically the …
The writ petition filed by Prakash E. Niphadkar in 2002 sought relief against Vasant Soma Chaudhari. A rule was granted in September 2002, but the petitioner's advocate was discharged in 2010. Subsequent court notices could not be served as the petitioner did not reside at the recorded address, and …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking to quash the FIR, charge-sheet and criminal proceedings (Police Case No. 949/Pw/2017, CR No. 292/2016) for offences under sections 143, 147, 149, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The matter was listed, but the applicants and their counsel …
The High Court of Bombay heard three writ petitions filed by Vithal Damodar Sadgir, Irfan Yusuf Shaikh, and Dinesh Prabhakar Bhat. The petitioners, represented by Advocate Virendra Pethe, sought relief but the court found that the petitions had become infructuous. Consequently, the court disposed of …
The petitioners filed three writ petitions before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioners' counsel, Mr. Virendra Pethe, submitted that the petitions had become infructuous. The Court accepted this submission and ordered that the writ petitions stand disposed as infructuous. No further orders or …
Jayant Furnishers Private Limited filed an interim application seeking restoration of a civil revision petition that had been dismissed for non‑prosecution. The revision petition was intended to challenge an order allowing the defendant’s application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and …
The appellant, Bhaiyalal Sinh, was convicted by the Sessions Court for murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed, challenging the conviction on the basis that the prosecution’s case relied heavily on the ‘last seen together’ theory and circumstantial evidence, …
The petitioners, a group of eligible slum dwellers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus to halt construction of the saleable component of a slum rehabilitation scheme and to compel the developer to pay pending transit rent. The High Court, after allowing amendment, directed …
The appellants in Second Appeal No. 1362 of 2004 failed to serve the unserved respondents and did not file the required private paper‑book as ordered on 29 November 2007. The court, noting the office remark, observed that the appellant’s counsel had not complied with these procedural directions. By …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order of the Divisional Joint Registrar that directed it to admit respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. The society argued that private clauses in its construction and …
The appellant filed a partition suit claiming a one‑sixth share in ancestral lands, while the respondents contended that an oral partition in 1980 barred the claim by limitation. The trial court granted a partial decree in favour of the appellant and ordered partition of certain schedules of …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The petitioner, Snehal Tower Cooperative Housing Society, challenged the order admitting respondent No.1 as a member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, arguing that private clauses in the construction agreement barred admission until project completion. The society …
The Bombay High Court heard two criminal applications, APL/807/2025 filed by Abdul Hafeez Shaikh and APL/446/2024 filed by Saket Anil Bagaria, both against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants sought enforcement of an earlier order dated 28 January 2026 that directed the respondents to pay …
The petitioners, Smt. Ashy alias Seema Haresh Ahuja, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed in Special Civil Suit No. 19 of 2011 against the respondent, Shri Deepak Mohanlal Ahuja. The impugned order was sought to be set aside, but the court clerk’s case status indicated that the civil …
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) appealed against tribunal awards granting compensation to claimants arising from a 2 February 2018 road accident involving a private car and an MSRTC bus. The appellant argued that the tribunal erred by not attributing negligence to the car …
The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) appealed against tribunal awards granting compensation to claimants arising from a 2 February 2018 road accident involving a private car and an MSRTC bus. The appellant argued that the tribunal erred by not attributing negligence to the car …
The complainant alleged that a partner firm and its partners issued a cheque to discharge a hand loan taken by a third party, which later bounced, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court convicted the accused, but the Additional Sessions Court …
Vivek Mangala and another filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the quash of FIR C.R.No.I‑111 of 2014 registered at Kalwa Police Station, alleging that the FIR was illegal, null and void. The petitioners argued that the investigating agency had filed a ‘C’ Summary Report which was still …
The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeal filed by Mulund Sejal Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. against an order of the City Civil Court that had restrained the society from interfering with the possession of Sunil Omprakash Agarwal. The court examined the pleadings and found that the plaintiff’s …
Yogesh Gori filed a writ petition challenging a notice issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) that sought to remove his name from the Institute’s register of members on the allegation that he had issued false certificates. The High Court earlier stayed the publication of …
The appellant, Brahmjyoti B‑Wing Mirani Tenants Association (Proposed), filed an appeal against orders of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted the request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, all …
The appellant, Brahmjyoti B‑Wing Mirani Tenants Association (Proposed), filed an appeal against orders of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court granted the request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Consequently, all …
The appellant, Kapildev Chug, filed an application for leave to appeal against the acquittal granted by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 64th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai, in Criminal Case No.35/SW/2012 dated 12 March 2024. The High Court of Bombay examined the impugned judgment and identified arguable …
The Regional Director of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation appealed against a damages order of the ESI Court, invoking the 2025 Amnesty Scheme which mandates withdrawal of an appeal once the ordered damages are paid. The respondent, M/s. Sanjay Maintenance Services, claimed to have …
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai issued a notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 for demolition of a suit structure. The corporation appealed the order that quashed the notice. The High Court held that the notice was invalidly issued and therefore quashed …
The appellant filed a second appeal and a civil application but failed to appear for the hearing scheduled to consider condonation of delay. The court noted that the appellant did not appear on the last date and again failed to appear when the matter was listed for dismissal. Consequently, the court …
The applicant, Bibhushan Dilipkumar Parija, a senior manager at HDFC Bank, was charged under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide after his subordinate, Jitendra Sharma, allegedly was humiliated and physically assaulted by him and subsequently jumped onto a train. The trial court rejected the …
The applicant, Abdul Gaffar Kurban Khan, was charged under IPC sections 302, 307, 120(b), 212, 201 r/w 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 5, 25 and 27 for allegedly murdering a person and attempting to kill his brother. He had been in custody for over three years with no progress in the trial, while …
Deepesh Koranjirath filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant sought leave to withdraw the application on instructions. The court considered the request and noted that the applicant was not on board, but allowed the withdrawal. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 7829 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court. The matter was listed under the caption “For Dismissal,” but the petitioners failed to appear before the court. The court noted the absence of the petitioners despite multiple listings. Consequently, the court …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and, finding no impediment, granted leave to withdraw. …
The applicants, New Mahesh Villa Co‑Op Housing Society Ltd. and others, sought restoration of an appeal (First Appeal No. 1376 of 2013) that had been dismissed by self‑operative order on 24 January 2019 for failure to file the paper‑book within eight weeks. They filed an interim application on 17 …
The petitioner, Swapnil Rajan Pandhrinath Ahire, filed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that rejected his application for framing additional issues. The order was characterized as an interlocutory order. The High Court examined whether such an interlocutory order could be interfered …
The State of Maharashtra appealed against the enhancement of compensation awarded to the respondents for land acquired under the Chaskman Dam Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed compensation at Rs.1,02,969, which the Reference Court enhanced to Rs.2,12,258. The State …
The appellant, Kulin Ravindra Sampat, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court on the scheduled date of 19 November 2025, leading to an adjournment to 22 December 2025 to give a fair opportunity. Despite the adjournment, the appellant remained unrepresented and the appointed advocate returned …
The petitioner, Ali Akbar Adamjee Peerbhoy, failed to appear when called for hearing in his writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The Court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. Consequently, the interim application (No. 11443 of 2025) filed in the same proceedings was held to have …
The applicant, Subodh Sadanand Ghag, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR (CR No.85 of 2025) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to a property dispute with his ex‑wife, the first …
The petitioner, Rameshchandra Jain, filed a contempt petition against Universal Builders and Developers and others, challenging the titles of two orders dated 28 January 2026 and 12 January 2026. The orders incorrectly recorded the jurisdiction as "ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION" instead of …
The writ petition filed by Ravindra Vasudeo Salvi was dismissed for non-prosecution. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the previous occasion or on the present date. The matter was listed for dismissal and the court ordered the petition to be dismissed. Consequently, any pending …
The petitioner, Nitesh Rane, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2722 of 2023 before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, through Advocate Milan Desai, applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The respondent State of Maharashtra, represented by APP S.S. Kaushik, opposed the …
M/S A.R.S. Agri Science Pvt. Ltd. filed a criminal application seeking a review of the final order dated 21 April 2015 in Criminal Writ Petition No.2470/2014, requesting that the order be called for rehearing. The application was listed under "Prioritised Cases" but the applicant, a person named …
The petitioner, Shri Bhagwat Ramchandra Shinde, filed a writ petition seeking an injunction to restrain certain respondents from executing a notice dated 17 June 2016 issued under Section 54 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act and from removing his construction or obstructing his …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order made under Section 77A of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which appointed an Administrator after the disqualification of office bearers under Section 79A(3). The court observed that the petition only contested the …
The NSEL Investors Action Group filed Criminal Appeal No.847 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, seeking to challenge certain orders. The appellant submitted an affidavit dated 27 January 2026, in which it solemnly requested leave to withdraw the appeal. The respondents and other parties raised no …
The applicant, Dhanraj Motiram Bachhav, filed two criminal revision applications (Nos. 638/2008 and 639/2008) before the Bombay High Court. During the pendency, the applicant died on 1 December 2025 and a death certificate was produced. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted the death …
The applicant, Ajinkya Raju Salunkhe, filed a criminal bail application before the Bombay High Court while his trial was nearing completion. The State, through its counsel, argued that the trial was almost over and therefore bail should not be granted. The learned judge considered the stage of the …
The original complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking leave to appeal a magistrate's order acquitting the respondents of offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court held that the …
The appellant, Mr. Mohd Hamid Khan, filed a civil application seeking a stay of the City Civil Court's order that dismissed his suit challenging a notice issued under Section 55 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act. The trial court had held that the appellant failed to prove that …
The applicant, Ravi Madhukar Kamble, was charged under IPC sections 363, 376(2)(n), 496 and POCSO Act sections 3, 4, 5(1), 6 for allegedly kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 16‑year‑old girl, who was said to have a consensual love affair with him. The prosecution argued that the applicant was …
The Kohinoor Cooperative Housing Society challenged an order of the Appellate Authority that directed it to admit Shabnoor Ayub as a member and issue a share certificate, alleging that the applicant lacked a document of title and that the society’s rules required a registered agreement. The dispute …
The petition was filed by the guardian of minor plaintiffs to challenge orders directing the guardian to deposit a compromise amount and to reject the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint. The plaintiffs, now having attained majority, sought to withdraw the deposited amount and to amend the …
The appellant, the legal heir of the deceased Yusuf T. Jummani, appealed an order dated 9 August 2019 that had set aside the trial court’s judgment and remanded the case to the trial court without framing any points for determination or recording findings. The appellant argued that the first …
Siraj Fakir Mohammad Qureshi filed a criminal revision seeking to challenge the trial court's order rejecting his discharge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. While the revision was pending, the court framed charges against him and he filed a separate application …
Padmanabh Shivram Karmarkar filed a criminal writ petition alleging that he was denied possession of a suit property. The respondents, Yogesh Laxman Dodke and another, filed an application for restoration of possession, claiming they were dispossessed. The petitioner’s counsel contended that the …
Manju Chunilal Gujar filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench. The court observed that, because of a substantial lapse of time, the petition had become infructuous. Consequently, the …
The petitioner challenged an order of the Grievance Redressal Committee that denied him a rehabilitation unit under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 because he had not produced any document showing possession of the premises prior to 2016. The committee …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear before the court. No representation was made on their behalf. The court noted the non-appearance and dismissed the writ petition in default. No substantive merits of the petition were considered. The order was …
The petitioners, Satish Bhujanga Shetty and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.4, a private landlord, to remove a lock and allow repair work on a building terrace, along with various ancillary orders. The same reliefs had previously been sought …
The appellants, the heirs of the late B. Joseph Baliah Nadar, challenged a notice issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, alleging illegal construction of a 100 sq.ft. shed. The City Civil Court had upheld the notice and …
The writ petition filed by Naaz Asif Shaikh & Ors. was listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. No appearance was made by the petitioners despite the listing. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The order directs that any further actions be taken upon receipt of …
The applicant filed an interim application in a criminal bail matter (BA/1835/2025) seeking temporary relief pending the final decision on bail. Counsel for the applicant, Mr. Vijaykumar Dighe and Mr. Nabar (on behalf of Ms. Sonali R. Chavan), presented arguments supporting the grant of the interim …
Dr. Raghunandan B. Nikam retired on 31 December 2017 at age 60 and petitioned the Bombay High Court for a direction to the State of Maharashtra and Thane Municipal Corporation to pay his pension of Rs. 23,375 and gratuity of Rs. 7,00,000 based on his basic pay. He relied on a Division Bench decision …
The applicants, Shila Narayan Ghanekar and others, filed an interim application in a civil appeal seeking to withdraw the present application because it was drafted by a junior advocate and was allegedly improper. They requested liberty to file a fresh, properly drafted interim application. The …
The applicant, Shahnawaz M. Khan, filed a criminal revision application and subsequently sought leave to withdraw it. The learned counsel for the applicant moved the court for permission to withdraw the revision. The court granted leave to withdraw, and the revision application was dismissed as …
The petitioner, a senior corporate executive, challenged a Look Out Circular (LOC) issued by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under Section 212(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, relating to an investigation into M/s. ISMT Limited. He argued that he had fully cooperated with the …
The appellant, Sarafuddin, filed an appeal against an order of the Trial Court while the suit was already at the evidence stage. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal, arguing that the proceedings were ongoing in the lower court. The High Court considered the request and found …
The appellant, Sarafuddin, filed an appeal against an order of the Trial Court while the suit was already at the evidence stage. The appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal, arguing that the proceedings were ongoing in the lower court. The High Court considered the request and found …
The Vinayak Ashish Cooperative Housing Society Limited filed an interim application (No. 638 of 2026) in Writ Petition No. 7202 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief against respondents Laxmikant Hirji Raikundaliya and others. The application sought the grant of relief specified in …
The petitioners, eligible slum dwellers, sought writs under Article 226 to halt construction of the saleable component of a slum rehabilitation scheme and to compel payment of pending transit rent. The High Court, recalling its earlier order allowing amendment of the petition, examined the …
The applicant, having deposited Rs.3 lakh as fine before the Sessions Court and undergone sentencing, filed an interim application seeking to withdraw Rs.50,000 from that deposit while a criminal revision application remains pending. The Sessions Court had earlier permitted the withdrawal of …
The Bombay High Court, acting suo motu, reviewed an order dated January 28, 2026, to correct a clerical error concerning the appearance of the respondents. The court, after a chambers review, directed that the respondent's counsel be correctly recorded as "Mr. R.S. Datar, for Respondents." The …
Asmita Sunil Patil filed an interim application seeking restoration of her pending bail application (No. 774 of 2025) after it had been withdrawn or otherwise removed from the court file. The applicant, represented by Mr. Khalid Azmi, argued that the bail application should be reinstated for …
The petitioners, Vishnu Vaman Nimse & Ors., filed Writ Petition (St.) No.11420 of 2025 seeking payment of their old pension. The Registrar (Judicial‑I) raised office objections, gave two weeks for compliance, and upon non‑removal rejected the petition on 7 May 2025. The petitioners filed an interim …
Karansingh Surjitsing Bhada applied for regular bail in a case of robbery and organized crime offences under IPC s.392 r/w s.34 and the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act. He has been in custody for over two years with no trial progress, while a co-accused with similar charges has been …
The applicant, Nagnath @ Hari Vitthal Patil, filed a criminal bail application which the High Court allowed him to withdraw, granting liberty to file a fresh application after five months. The order dated 28th January 2026 erroneously stated that the liberty to file a fresh application was after one …
The applicant, Siddhesh Nitin Dhumal, was arrested for allegedly setting fire to two motorcycles belonging to an informant and neighbours on 9 June 2025, an offence punishable under Sections 326(g) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which carries a maximum sentence of life …
The High Court corrected the name of the appellant in three second appeals from "Ultra Lifespace Pvt Ltd" to "Ulltra Lifespace Pvt. Ltd." as per the order dated 17 December 2025. The appellant asserted that it had cleared outstanding maintenance and other charges owed to the society, albeit five …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 16519, 16518, 16407, 16405, 16523, 16883, 1139 of 2025/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitions were listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Manish Pitale and Hon'ble Justice Shreeram …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 16519, 16518, 16407, 16405, 16523, 16883, 1139 of 2025/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitions were listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Manish Pitale and Hon'ble Justice Shreeram …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 16519, 16518, 16407, 16405, 16523, 16883, 1139 of 2025/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitions were listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Manish Pitale and Hon'ble Justice Shreeram …
The High Court of Bombay granted bail to the applicant, Pravin Ramesh Gholap, on 28th January 2026. The order, however, omitted the names of the advocates representing Respondent No.2 in the two bail applications (Harshwardhan Pawar and Shantanu Nakashe). The applicant moved a precipe seeking …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd filed a series of writ petitions (Nos. 16519, 16518, 16407, 16405, 16523, 16883, 1139 of 2025/2026) against the State of Maharashtra and its officials. The petitions were listed before a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Manish Pitale and Hon'ble Justice Shreeram …
The applicants, Nitten Laxmanrao Chavan and Sarfraj Ahmed Ulfatali Shaikh, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for offences under Sections 316(4) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections …
Tata Capital Housing Finance Ltd., through its legal manager, filed multiple writ petitions in the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners later sought the court's permission to withdraw all the pending writ petitions. The court considered whether it could entertain the …
The applicant, Vaibhav Narayan Avchar, was charged under IPC Sections 302, 323 read with 34 for a murder that occurred on 5 November 2023. He had been in custody for over two years and three months with no significant progress in the trial, while co‑accused facing similar charges had been released …
The High Court considered two bail applications arising from the same cyber‑fraud case in which the applicants were alleged to have hacked a bank account and withdrawn Rs.1,95,419. The offences were charged under Sections 319(2), 318(4) r/w Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and …
The husband filed a miscellaneous civil application seeking transfer of domestic violence (DV) proceedings, filed by his wife before a Metropolitan Magistrate, to the Family Court where his divorce suit was pending. The applicant’s counsel initially claimed the wife worked in Bangalore, later …
The applicant, Sanil Vasant Gaikwad, was charged under Sections 64(2)(m), 138, 304(2) and 115(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly kidnapping and sexually assaulting a woman. The complainant initially alleged that three persons were involved, but later amended her statement to …
The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash FIR No. 436 of 2023 and the accompanying charge‑sheet, alleging that the dispute with Respondent No. 2 had been amicably settled. Both the applicants’ counsel and Respondent No. 2’s counsel consented to the …
The applicant, Priyal @ Bunty Gagaram Kharmale, was charged with murder and criminal conspiracy under Sections 302 and 120‑B read with 34 of the IPC. He had been in custody for over two years and eight months without charge framing, while co‑accused had been released on bail. The prosecution argued …
The applicant, Asma Dastagir Shaikh, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. The applicant was represented by Mr. Anil Bansode, while the State of Maharashtra was represented by Ms. Anuja S. Gotad. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant requested that the bail application be …
The applicants filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 118(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from an assault on the first informant. The …
The applicants filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 118(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from an assault on the first informant. The …
The applicant, Mohammad Arif Dakhave, was convicted under Section 304-A of the IPC and Section 33 of the Maharashtra Medical Practitioner Act, 1961, receiving a two‑year rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1,00,000. He filed an interim application seeking suspension of the sentence and bail, …
Santaji Shivaji Shelke filed Writ Petition No.1009 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court challenging a grievance against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner had filed an application on 25 September 2025, and Respondent No.4 undertook to decide that application within six weeks of the …
The petitioner, Pinky Anand, filed a criminal writ petition alleging harassment on her social media page by unknown individuals on 14 May 2024, with objectionable photographs posted. She sought addition of several provisions of the Information Technology Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and …
The applicants, Chintra Bapurao Gedam and Sagar Anandrao Gundav, filed a criminal bail application (No. 4618 of 2025) before the High Court of Bombay. An interim application (No. 4854 of 2025) was subsequently moved seeking relief pending the final decision on the bail petition. Counsel for the …
The Bombay High Court received a list of about 88 first appeals that were proposed to be heard together with First Appeal No. 2123 of 2005. The court examined whether these appeals fell within the jurisdiction of the learned Single Judge. It concluded that the list pertained to the jurisdiction of …
In Criminal Writ Petition No. 3292 of 2016, the petitioner, represented by Mr. Vivek Patil, sought relief against the State. The Court, presided over by Justice Sadhana S. Jadhav, ordered that notices be issued to respondents Nos. 1 to 6 and that service be waived for respondent No. 7, with the …
Three private schools – Laxmi English Medium School, Atma Malik English Medium Gurukul and Atma Malik English Gurukul & Jr. College – filed a writ petition seeking the release of arrears they claim are due under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The Court noted a …
A batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenged several Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board’s opinion that a disease was a constitutional disorder and not attributable or …
A batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenged several Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board’s opinion that a disease was a constitutional disorder and not attributable or …
A batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenged several Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board’s opinion that a disease was a constitutional disorder and not attributable or …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of criminal proceedings (R.C.C. No. 753 of 2013) pending before the trial court. The trial court had previously listed the case on 23 July 2021, but the petitioners failed to appear, resulting in non‑framing of charge. On 20 January 2026 the …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash of FIR No. 169 of 2020 and related criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The dispute arose from …
Mahesh Kamat filed Criminal Application No.108 of 2020 before the Bombay High Court. No party appeared on the scheduled date, and the applicant failed to appear thereafter, indicating loss of interest. The court noted that the matter had not been circulated since filing. Consequently, the court …
Atul Govind Patil filed a writ petition which was dismissed by the Registrar (Judicial‑I) on 23 September 2025 for failure to remove office objections, without any notice to the respondent. The applicant filed an interim application seeking restoration of the petition, arguing that the dismissal at …
The Bombay High Court examined an anticipatory bail application filed by Shreeyash Manik Jagtap in connection with C.R. No.178 of 2025, where all accused had surrendered. Earlier, the court had declined pre‑arrest bail, citing the seriousness of the offence, but noted concerns about police conduct …
The applicants sought quashing of FIR No. 561/2025 registered for alleged trespass and offences under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST Act, claiming the allegations were false and that a civil suit over the property was pending. The State argued that the FIR disclosed all …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The applicants filed a criminal application seeking quash of FIR C.R. No.I‑2 of 2019, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code arising from an assault incident in a school. The FIR was lodged by the complainant, Respondent No.2, as a counter‑complaint to a …
Aakash Pralhad Pole applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No. 214 of 2025 for alleged cattle theft, charged under Sections 325, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 11(1)(c) of the Animal Cruelty Act. The prosecution’s charge‑sheet contained only the co‑accused’s …
The appellants, Mohd. Mujeekullah Karimullah Shaikh & Ors., filed an appeal against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The High Court, after issuing an order on 16 January 2026, warned that failure to appear would result in dismissal for non‑prosecution. The appellants did not appear on …
The appellants, Mohd. Mujeekullah Karimullah Shaikh & Ors., filed an appeal against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The court had earlier warned that failure to appear would result in dismissal for non‑prosecution. On the scheduled date, the appellants did not appear. Consequently, the …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
Premium Tools Private Limited and others challenged a series of orders issued by the Assistant Labour Commissioner under Section 33C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which granted recovery certificates. The petitioners argued that the Competent Authority had exceeded its jurisdiction because …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The appellants, Russel Boswell Francis Pereira & Anr., filed an appeal against an order dated 2021, along with two interim applications. The High Court, after issuing a notice on 9 January 2026, warned that failure to appear would result in dismissal for non‑prosecution. The appellants did not …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The petitioner, a custom clerk of 23 years, filed a writ petition challenging a 2019 order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal that dismissed his claim for reinstatement, back wages, and salary difference under a labour settlement. He alleged oral termination on 1 May 2011 after being …
The High Court examined a dispute arising under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 concerning Godown No. 16 and the land beneath it. The plaintiffs, heirs of the deceased Damji Gelabhai Shah, claimed ownership of both the land and the godown based on a conveyance deed dated 12‑December‑2002, …
The dispute concerned Godown No. 16 and the land beneath it in Lower Parel, Mumbai, governed by the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The original owners, New Sun Mills Co., had let the premises to Arvind Engineering Company in 1956 and later agreed to sell the godown for Rs 20,000 in 1981, while …
M/s. Kusum Power Control Cable Co. filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court. The Court noted on 9 January 2026 that no counsel for either party had appeared. It warned that failure to appear would lead to dismissal for want of prosecution. On 23 January 2026, still no party appeared before the …
Sandip, the applicant, filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. His counsel sought permission to withdraw the bail application, requesting that the applicant be allowed to file a fresh bail application after six months if the trial shows no progress. The State of Maharashtra opposed …
The appellants, accused of offences under the IPC and UAPA for delivering provocative speeches, were arrested in September 2020 and have been in pre‑trial detention for over five years without charge being framed. They sought bail on the ground of parity and prolonged incarceration, arguing that …
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. appealed a decision concerning the existence of an employer-employee relationship and the nature of a disability suffered by a respondent. The Commissioner had held that an employer-employee relationship existed between the two respondents despite the vehicle being …
The Bombay High Court considered several criminal revision applications filed by Husna Atikur Rehman Shaikh and related applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants failed to appear for the scheduled hearings, despite the court granting an additional opportunity on 23 January 2026. …
Sandip Somnath Hiray filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through its learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, contended that the applicant had a prior antecedent which was not disclosed in the application. The applicant's counsel sought to …
The applicants, Haresh Parmanand Jashnani and others, filed Criminal Application No. 288 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. They later approached the court seeking to withdraw the application, stating that a settlement had been reached between the parties. The learned counsel for the applicants, …
The applicant, Anuj Jitesh Shah, filed Criminal Application No.293 of 2019 seeking relief against the respondents. Counsel for the applicant informed the court that the dispute had been settled between the parties and requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the request …
The appellant, Balkrishna Vishram Mahiskar, filed an appeal against an order of the Chief Officer, Dharavi Rehabilitation Project. The High Court, after issuing a notice on 16 January 2026, warned that failure to appear would result in dismissal for non‑prosecution. The appellant did not appear on …
The applicant, Santosh Sitaram Gaikwad, filed a criminal application but failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, indicated that the charges had been framed and the trial was proceeding to the evidence stage. Since the applicant did not …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed in several service writ petitions against the Managerial Director of M/s. Hyundai Construction Equipment India Ltd. The petitioners sought relief under the prayer clause (a) and raised concerns about procedural delays and office …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of interim applications filed in several service writ petitions against the Managerial Director of M/s. Hyundai Construction Equipment India Ltd. The petitioners sought relief under the prayer clause (a) and raised concerns about procedural delays and office …
Smt. Amrin Begum filed an appeal against an order of the Railway Claims Tribunal but failed to file the appeal within the prescribed period, resulting in a 268‑day delay. She sought condonation of the delay, citing poverty, illiteracy and desertion by her husband as reasons. The Court held that …
M/s. Fame Builders filed a civil revision application against Parmar Constructions. The applicant failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 16 January 2026. The court again noted the applicant's non-appearance on 23 January 2026. It was observed that the applicant had lost interest …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging Armed Forces Tribunal orders that granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel. The petitioners argued that the Medical Board opinions that a disease was a constitutional disorder and …
The petitioner, Vaishali Vitthal Kharade, filed Criminal Application No.421 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. No counsel or party appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled date of 22 January 2026, and the petitioner continued to be absent thereafter. The court observed that the application …
The appellants, Kantaben Navinchandra Shah and others, filed an appeal against the Designated Officer, Executive Engineer. The High Court issued a notice on 16 January 2026 requiring the appellants to appear, warning that failure to do so would result in dismissal for non‑prosecution. The appellants …
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly killing his wife with an axe and was sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, the appellant argued that there was no direct eye‑witness, that key panch witnesses had turned hostile, and that his alibi defence was not …
The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC for allegedly killing his wife with an axe and was sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution relied on testimony of the appellant's father, other family members, a doctor’s post‑mortem report, forensic blood‑group analysis linking the …
Nanasaheb Shankarrao Gaikwad filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. Vithal Shivanand Gurav, as the first informant, filed an interim application seeking to intervene in the bail proceedings. The court heard arguments from counsel representing the applicant, the intervenor, and the …
The appellant, Rashida Saifuddin Bharmal, filed an appeal against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay. The Court issued an order on 16 January 2026 warning that the appeal would be dismissed for non‑prosecution if the appellant did not appear. The appellant failed to appear on the scheduled …
Dr. Rashmi Saluja, former Executive Chairman of Religare Enterprises Ltd., challenged the registration of FIR No.355/2024 and the ECIR/MBZO‑I/27/2024 issued by the Directorate of Enforcement under the Prevention of Money‑Laundering Act (PMLA). She argued that the FIR was barred by special statutes …
M/s. R.J. Guest World & Anr. filed a civil revision application (No. 206 of 2022) before the High Court of Bombay. The applicants failed to appear at the first hearing on 16 January 2026, and the matter was listed for dismissal. On the subsequent date, 23 January 2026, the applicants again did not …
The applicant, Dara Dadiba Gowadia, filed a criminal revision application (No. 295 of 2010) before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel informed the court that the applicant had passed away, leaving no surviving interest in the proceedings. The court noted that the death of a party …
Petitioner Rohan Agarwal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the petitioner wished to unconditionally withdraw the petition. The Court accepted the withdrawal …
The State of Maharashtra, through the Special Land Acquisition Officer, appealed against the enhancement of compensation awarded to the heirs of the deceased Shri Kisan Kashiram Lilke for land acquired for the Karanjwan Dam Project. The Special Land Acquisition Officer had initially fixed …
The husband, who runs a clinic in a flat undergoing redevelopment, filed an interim application seeking an order that his wife, a 50% co‑owner, execute the Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreement (PAAA) with the developer and that he be given possession of the new premises during the pendency of …
The TJSB Sahakari Bank Limited and another filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners were directed to comply with certain orders of the Court. They failed to do so and indicated they were not ready to comply. The Court noted …
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal filed by Shreeji Bhavan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay because the appellant failed to appear before the court despite a prior notice. The court had earlier warned that non-appearance would lead to …
The applicant, Mr. Shrikant Nonaya Kotian, filed Criminal Applications No. 226 and 227 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court against the respondents. The applicant, through counsel, later sought leave of the court to withdraw these applications. The court considered the procedural request without delving …
The applicants failed to appear before the High Court on the scheduled date for Criminal Application No.608 of 2019. The respondent's counsel informed the Court that the police had filed a "B" Summary Report, which the complainant challenged by filing a protest petition (C.C. No.3605/MISC./2022). …
Mahesh Kishan Motewar filed Criminal Application No.630 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court. No party appeared on the scheduled date of 22 January 2026, and the applicant continued to be absent. The court observed that the matter had not been progressed since filing and the applicant appeared to …
The petitioner, Dinanath Bhikaji Kanade, filed a criminal writ petition in 2014 which was initially dismissed for want of prosecution. The dismissal was later recalled in 2017, and the petition was restored for admission after four weeks. However, the petitioner and his counsel did not appear before …
The appellant, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, appealed against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of Rs.6,25,000 with 7% interest to the claimants under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act. The accident on 23 June 2018 involved an MSRTC bus and a jeep, the deceased being a …
A batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenged several Armed Forces Tribunal orders that had granted disability pensions to retired army and navy personnel on the ground that their diseases were not attributable to or aggravated by military service. The High Court examined the …
