Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
20841 judgments · newest first · showing 20801–20841
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The petitioners‑defendants challenged several orders of the trial court that closed their evidence and rejected applications to recall those orders, alleging denial of their right to adduce evidence. The trial court had closed the evidence of most defendants because they failed to confirm …
The applicant, Bramadeo Sobran Aloes Mahavir Yadav, was convicted under Sections 3 and 4 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment with a fine. He had already been in custody for three months, in addition to an earlier 20‑day detention, and filed an …
Amol Ramdas Konde and Krushnat Mahadev Aarde were charged in CR No.124/2022 for offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 82 of the Registration Act, alleging forgery of a NA order. Their first anticipatory bail application (ABA …
Prithviraj Enterprises and another filed a writ petition (ST.) No.17937 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court challenging certain office objections raised by the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners sought relief to have the deadline for removing those objections extended. The Court, …
Petitioner Ravindra Rajaram Patil filed Writ Petition No.155 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of Kalyan‑Dombivli Municipal Corporation and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted an email dated 7 January 2026 indicating that the dispute had been settled between the parties …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
The applicant, Deepak Kumar Dhulichand Jain, sought bail in a criminal case (C.R.No.41 of 2025) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999, relating to a alleged Ponzi scheme run by his son Ankit Jain and co‑accused. …
Varun Sundar Shetty filed a writ petition challenging the delay in hearing Externment Appeal No. 22/2025, which was filed in February 2025 against an externment order dated 10 January 2025. The Appellate Authority had not listed the appeal for hearing. The petitioner argued that the statutory remedy …
The petitioner filed a praecipe seeking correction of clerical errors in the order dated 08.01.2026. The Court examined the appearance clause and identified that it should read “Mr. Abhijit B. Kadam, Advocate i/by Uday B. Nighot and Ms. Akanksha Gond for Petitioner.” It also noted that the date …
The applicant, Gautam Shahajirao Kakade, was arrested for offences including murder (IPC s.302) and several other IPC and Arms Act sections arising from an altercation over a unpaid amount for a bullock, during which a co-accused shot the deceased. The prosecution alleges the applicant called the …
The applicant, Anas Ashfaq Shaikh, has been in custody since 26 September 2023. An earlier bail application was withdrawn by order of the High Court on 26 June 2025, after the trial court rejected his bail on the ground that the defence had caused delays. The applicant filed a fresh bail application …
The applicant, Suvarna Sudhir Kumbhare, was charged under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the alleged murder of her husband, whose post‑mortem indicated injuries suggestive of asphyxia. The prosecution’s case relied on the deceased’s sister’s testimony and the post‑mortem …
The applicant, Divesh Santosh Sutar, an 18‑year‑old, was arrested in connection with the murder of Abhishek Singh under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that six accused and a juvenile assaulted the deceased, leading to his death, and that the …
The applicant, Hasmukh Bhai Jesha Bhai Bhutak, filed a criminal application seeking the High Court's inherent powers under sections 482 and 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for records of a pending magistrate case (PS/3220/2017) and to quash the FIR filed against him under IPC sections 279 …
The applicant, Ruksar Ahemad Husain Barbhiya, was arrested under the NDPS Act based solely on the statement of a co‑accused, Hafizullah Khan, who alleged she dealt in heroin. No narcotic substances were recovered from her person or premises, and the prosecution’s case rests on that testimony. The …
Shahid Ibrahim Shaikh filed a bail application before the Bombay High Court. After hearing, the learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Gautam T. Kanchanpurkar, requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court, after considering the request, granted permission to withdraw. …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging a Small Causes Court order that stayed an eviction decree and required the petitioners to pay Rs.30,000 per month as interim compensation. Both parties consented to modify the interim compensation amount to …
The petitioner, Mr. Akil Khalik Peerjade, sought a decision on a pending appeal against a disciplinary action dated 10 October 2025. He claimed to have received an undated order, purportedly signed on 3 January 2026, indicating that the appeal had been decided. The petitioner wished to challenge …
The petitioner, Irfan @ Chipdya Noor Mohd. Shaikh, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash a notice dated 20 December 2025 issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Police under section 163(2) of the Bharatiya Nyay Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State argued that the order was ex parte and that any …
Hanumant Vasudev Mohite was convicted under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to up to three years imprisonment with a fine, plus a one‑month simple imprisonment. The trial court had already suspended the sentence during the appeal and granted interim bail. The applicant filed an …
The Registrar noted that the Second Appeal No. 731 of 2022 had been listed four times and that despite a six‑week extension, the parties had failed to remove the office objections. Under Chapter V of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, parties must clear such objections within 14 days …
Mehboob Abdul Hamid Shaikhji filed a writ petition (No.12437 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court against the deceased Parvati Gangaram Mosamkar and Anjiali Ganpat Paste. The petitioner sought relief but the court noted that the address of respondent No.1.A was not on record, making service of notice …
The petitioner, Prakash Datta Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Election Officer and others. Before arguments began, the petitioner, through counsel Amogh Karandikar, expressed an intention to withdraw the writ petition and instead pursue an election …
Petitioner Aadesh Suresh Jadhav filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking liberty to withdraw the petition and later file an election petition if required. The petitioner, represented by counsel Nitin Gaware Patil, Omkar Chavan and Advocate Z.H. Farooqui, appeared in person. The …
Gauri Ganesh Nanaware filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his nomination as a candidate of a national political party, alleging that the returning officer declined the nomination because a whitener had been used to obscure a previously typed name on Annexure‑2 and a new name was …
The petitioner, Jayashree Moreshwar Bhondve, challenged the denial of her nomination as a Nationalist Congress Party candidate, alleging that the required Annexure 2 was submitted on the last permissible day but no order was issued by the Returning Officer. The petitioner produced an acknowledgment …
The petitioner, Savitri Hiralal Wani, filed a writ petition. During the hearing, Advocate Suhas P. Urgunde appeared via video conference for Respondent Nos.4 and 5, but his name was omitted from the appearance column of the order dated 2 January 2026. The advocate moved before the Vacation Court …
Petitioner Ratnabai Subodh Patil filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State Election Commission and the State. During the hearing, the petitioner, through counsel, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and indicated a possible future filing of …
Petitioner Prantosh Gangaram Waghmare filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the writ petition and sought liberty to file an election petition as provided by …
Mahesh filed a writ petition challenging the Returning Officer for the Municipal Corporation General Election 2025. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Avinash R. Borulkar, sought relief against the election officials. During the hearing, the petitioner indicated a desire to withdraw the writ …
Tushar Panditrao Bhartiya filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the Returning/Election Officer and other officials. The petition was listed and heard, and a pass‑over was granted on the petitioner's request. During the final hearing, the petitioner, through …
The applicant, Karan Ganpat Bhoir, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant, Ms. Swapana P. Kode, sought leave of the court to withdraw the application. The court considered the request and allowed the withdrawal. …
Petitioner Nilesh Subhash More filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition in order to pursue a statutory remedy available under law. The court considered the request …
